What is Hermitian? Definition & Summary

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hermitian
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Hermitian transpose, denoted as M^{\dagger}, is defined as the complex conjugate of the transpose of a matrix M. A matrix is classified as Hermitian if it satisfies the condition M^{\dagger} = M. In quantum mechanics, observables are represented by Hermitian operators, which are self-adjoint and ensure real expectation values. Key examples of Hermitian operators include the position operator \hat{x} and the momentum operator -i\hbar \dfrac{\partial}{\partial x}.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix operations, specifically transpose and complex conjugation.
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics concepts, particularly observables and operators.
  • Knowledge of bra-ket notation and wave function formalism.
  • Basic grasp of expectation values in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Hermitian matrices in linear algebra.
  • Explore the role of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the implications of Hermitian operators on the uncertainty principle.
  • Investigate the relationship between Hermitian operators and eigenvalues.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics, as well as mathematicians and engineers dealing with linear algebra and operator theory.

Messages
19,865
Reaction score
10,860
Definition/Summary

The Hermitian transpose or Hermitian conjugate (or conjugate transpose) M^{\dagger} of a matrix M is the complex conjugate of its transpose M^T.

A matrix is Hermitian if it is its own Hermitian transpose: M^{\dagger}\ =\ M.

An operator A is Hermitian (or self-adjoint) if it is its own adjoint: \langle Ax|y\rangle\ =\ \langle x|Ay\rangle (in the finite-dimensional case, that means that its matrix is Hermitian).

In quantum theory, an observable must be represented by a Hermitian operator (on a Hilbert space).

For other uses of the adjective "Hermitian", see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermitian.

Equations

\int \psi _1 ^* (\hat{O} \psi _2 ) \, dx = \int (\hat{O}\psi _1 )^* \psi _2 \, dx

\langle b |\hat{O} |c \rangle = \langle c |\hat{O} |b \rangle ^*

Extended explanation

A matrix M is hermitian if:
M^{\dagger} = (M^T)^* = M ,
where \dagger is called the hermitian conjugate, and is thus a combination of matrix transpose and complex conjugation of each entry in the matrix.

In quantum mechanics, observable quantities are assigned by hermitian operators. Examples of those are:

(with continuous spectrum)
position operator
\hat{x},

momentum operator
-i\hbar \dfrac{\partial}{\partial x},

(with discrete spectrum)
z-component of angular momentum operator
\hat{L}_z .

In terms of wave functions, an operator \hat{O} is hermitian if:
\int \psi _1 ^* (\hat{O} \psi _2 ) \, dx = \int (\hat{O}\psi _1 )^* \psi _2 \, dx

In terms of bra-ket:
\langle b |\hat{O} |c \rangle = \langle c |\hat{O} |b \rangle

Now, using the wave function formalism, some valuable identities will be presented:

Let us consider two hermitian operators \hat{A} and \hat{B}.

The expectation value:
<\hat{A}> = \int \psi ^* (\hat{A} \psi ) dx = \int (\hat{A}\psi )^* \psi dx,
is real, proof:
<\hat{A}>^* = \int ((\hat{A}\psi)^*\psi)^* dx = \int (\hat{A}\psi)\psi^* dx = \int \psi^* (\hat{A}\psi) dx = <\hat{A}>
Since \hat{A} was said to be hermitian, and \psi _1 = \psi _2 when we do expectation values.

Expectation value of \hat{A}^2:
<\hat{A}^2> = \int \psi ^* (\hat{A}(\hat{A}\psi)) dx = \int \psi^* (\hat{A}\tilde{\psi})dx =
(\tilde{\psi} = \hat{A}\psi \: \text{ is a new wavefunction} )
\int (\hat{A}\psi)^*\tilde{\psi}dx = \int (\hat{A}\psi)^*(\hat{A}\psi) dx

Now we can show another useful result:
\int \psi^* (\hat{A}(\hat{B}\psi))dx = \int(\psi^*(\hat{B}(\hat{A}\psi)))^*dx ,
prove this as an exercise.

Two more useful things:
I = \int \psi^*(\hat{A}\hat{B}+\hat{B}\hat{A})\psi = I^*
is real, show this as an exercise.

The operators always to the right if not indicated otherwise. Thus:
I = \int \psi^*(\hat{A}(\hat{B}\psi))dx + \int \psi^* (\hat{B}(\hat{A}\psi)) dx

J = \int \psi^*(\hat{A}\hat{B}-\hat{B}\hat{A})\psi = -J^*
is imaginary, show this as an exercise.

These identities are needed to prove the uncertainty relations of quantum mechanics.

* This entry is from our old Library feature. If you know who wrote it, please let us know so we can attribute a writer. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"What is a Hermitian" - this doesn't seem right grammatically. Hermitian is an adjective, unlike Hamiltonian, which is a noun. A better title for the future insight article would be "What is Hermitian Conjugate?"

(You can delete this post once you update the title, as this would then become useless.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K