What is Kepler-70b's surface like?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pds3.14
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Surface
AI Thread Summary
Kepler-70b orbits a star significantly brighter than the sun, resulting in extreme surface temperatures, with an equilibrium temperature around 7770 Kelvins and a maximum of 10988 Kelvins. Despite being classified as a "rocky" planet, its high temperatures suggest it may not maintain a stable atmosphere, as gases like CO2 would evaporate quickly. The planet is thought to be the rocky core remnant of a gas giant that interacted with its star during the latter's red giant phase. Current theories propose that Kepler-70b's surface is likely molten and lacks a substantial atmosphere, with any remaining material possibly evaporating into space. The discussion raises questions about the planet's composition and the nature of its surface conditions.
Pds3.14
Messages
22
Reaction score
1
The hot side of Kepler-70b is immensely hot. It orbits a star 21.8 times brighter than the sun at a distance of just 0.006 AU. The equilibrium temperature of a blackbody at that distance is about 7770 Kelvins, hotter than the surface of the sun by a substantial margin. The maximum temperature for such a body in the "noon" part of it is 10988 Kelvins.

The boiling points at 1 Atmosphere of all known forms of matter are substantially lower than either of these numbers.

And yet, this is classed as a "rocky" planet. Why? Is there something that I'm missing that would allow such a ball of fire to be able to support itself as a ball of rock and not, say, as a ball of lava covered in a multi-thousand-atmosphere glob of metallic vapor?

For that matter, It has an escape velocity of 8514 m/s. If I remember correctly, anything gaseous over 1/5th that speed will escape within a few thousand to a few million years, and the stellar wind will only accelerate that. This means that any gas less dense than 67g/mol, anything with less than a molecular/atomic weight of 67, will evaporate over a relatively short timescale.

This means that CO2, for example, would not be stable in the atmosphere. Worse still, I'm not sure it could even hold together at those temperatures.

So this means that any long-term atmosphere would need to be composed of individual atoms instead of molecules. The lightest individual atom that could be sustained is probably Galium.



Is there something I'm missing that would allow such a planet to exist without being coated in a thick layer of trace metals as gasses?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Pds3.14 said:
And yet, this is classed as a "rocky" planet. Why? Is there something that I'm missing that would allow such a ball of fire to be able to support itself as a ball of rock and not, say, as a ball of lava covered in a multi-thousand-atmosphere glob of metallic vapor?

Kepler-70b is believed to be the rocky core remnant of a gas giant that fell into its star's envelope during its red giant phase. The planet is probably still around in its current form because the star only recently passed through the red giant phase.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KOI-55
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kepler-70b
 
Drakkith said:
Kepler-70b is believed to be the rocky core remnant of a gas giant that fell into its star's envelope during its red giant phase. The planet is probably still around in its current form because the star only recently passed through the red giant phase.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KOI-55
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kepler-70b

Yes, but what IS its current form? A ball of rock? A ball of lava? A ball of compressed metallic vapor? Is it likely to have an atmosphere? Is it evaporating? Is it made of plasma?
 
Last edited:
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top