What is meant by standard error for linear and quaratic coefficients ?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of standard error for linear and quadratic coefficients in the context of fitting polynomial functions to data. Participants explore the implications of standard error as it relates to the variability of coefficient estimates derived from sample data.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Masood questions the interpretation of standard error for individual coefficients in a quadratic fit, noting that standard error is typically understood as the standard deviation from sampling data.
  • One participant suggests that multiple quadratic equations can fit the same data, leading to a range of values for each coefficient, where the calculated value represents an average and the uncertainty is the standard deviation.
  • Another participant emphasizes that coefficients estimated from sample data are random variables, indicating that different data sets will yield different coefficient results, each with a mean and standard deviation.
  • A further contribution explains that fitting a polynomial using least squares results in a single value for each coefficient, and discusses how to estimate standard error by considering the coefficient as a random variable generated from a probability model.
  • This participant also describes a method involving linearization of the problem, where assumptions about the data allow for expressing the variance of the coefficient as a function of the variances of the quantities involved, leading to an estimate of standard error.
  • There is a request for articles that explain the linearization approach in a straightforward manner, mentioning "asymptotic linearized confidence intervals" as a potential resource.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying interpretations of standard error in relation to coefficient estimates, with no consensus reached on a singular understanding or method for estimation.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the independence of random variables and the applicability of linear approximations, which are not universally accepted or resolved among participants.

masyousaf1
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Dear Fellows,

If we fit our data to a quadratic equation then What is meant by standard error for linear and quaratic coefficients ? I know that standard error is the standard deviation from the Sampling data. But for individual coefficients what is its interpretation ?

Best Wishes
Masood
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Exactly the same.
There are many quadratics that are consistent with that data - that gives a range of values for each coefficient.
The value you calculate is the average of all those values, and the uncertainty is the standard deviation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Any coefficient that is estimated from sample data is, itself, a random variable. Each set of data will give a different result. So the coefficient estimates have a mean and standard deviation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
masyousaf1 said:
What is meant by standard error for linear and quaratic coefficients ?

That's a good question. If you fit a polynomial function to data using least squares then you get a single value for each coefficient. From a single value, how can we estimate a standard error for the coefficient ?

You can imagine that your data is generated from some probability model. If you ran the model many times, you'd get many different sets of data. If you fit a polynomial equation to each data set then you'd get different values for coefficients. That explains the concept that a coefficient is a random variable. If you happen to have a probability model for the data, it explains how you could generate random values for a coefficient and estimate its standard error from them.

Another method is to make enough assumptions to linearize the problem. A coefficient for a curve fit is a function of the data. For linear and quadratic curve fits, its a function simple enough to write down. Write a linear approximation of this function and assume this is accurate enough. Assume the population means of the quantities involved in the linear approximation are equal to the means in the sample. Assume the variances of the quantities involved in the data are equal to the variances that are estimated from the sample. Since we have expressed the coefficient as a linear function of the data, we can express the variance of the coefficient as a linear function of the variances of the quantities involved in the data, provided we assume they are independent random variables. After we estimate the variance of the coefficient, we can take the square root of the variance as an estimate of the standard error.

Does anyone know of an article that explains the linearization approach in simple manner? If you look for articles on "asymptotic linearized confidence intervals", you can find theoretical treatments.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K