MATLAB What is program is better mathematica or matlab?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the effectiveness of Mathematica versus MATLAB for professors in publishing papers, particularly regarding graph creation. Mathematica is noted for its strengths in symbolic calculations and generating complex figures, while MATLAB excels in numerical simulations and practical coding applications. The consensus suggests that both programs can produce comparable basic graphs, with the quality of the output largely dependent on the user's creativity and understanding of graphing principles. The conversation also highlights that the choice of software may vary based on specific tasks, and emphasizes that the most effective tool is often the one a user is most familiar with. Ultimately, the ability to convey information clearly through graphs is deemed more important than the software used.
Futurestar33
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
If you are a professor is it better to use Mathematica or Matlab when it comes to publishing papers, which program creates the best graphs. I have origin as well.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on what you are doing as far as I can tell from rather limited experience.
I used mathematica for symbolic calculations and a little bit of numerical work on differential equations.
Matlab I used for setting up simulation codes. And it was great at that (mathematica not so much in my opinion).

About graphing, doesn't really matter. I did however use R once to create some 'exotic' graphs.
If you want simple scatter-plots with a fit I suppose both are comparable.
 
The most time-efficient tool for a professor to create graphs for publications is a system called "phd student" :biggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes Amrator and FactChecker
Futurestar33 said:
If you are a professor is it better to use Mathematica or Matlab when it comes to publishing papers, which program creates the best graphs. I have origin as well.

There is a number of very puzzling issues with this post.

1. What does being a "professor" have any relevance to this?

2. What is the definition of "better"? What is better for "A" may not be better for "B". A very wise and well-known tech expert, when once asked for the best word processor software in the world, replied "It is the one you use most often".

3. There is no such thing as "the best graphs". You can create an identical graph using many different packages. What is more important is YOUR creativity and sensible understanding of what a graph needs to convey clearly! This requires experience and thoughtfulness, not a better graphic package. You can buy the most expensive and "best" violin in the world, and you will still be unable to create a wonderful tune if you are a crappy musician.

4. This is not an Academic Guidance question, but rather, a tech question.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes JorisL
JorisL has the best answer. When doing symbolic work, Mathematica is much easier to use. It is also very easy to use in creating figures like lattices or symbolic band structures (graphene for example). However, MATLAB is much better for doing numerical work, like solving Einstein's equations for a given system for example.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K