What is required to read this article?

  • Context: Other 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MidgetDwarf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    article
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 1K views
MidgetDwarf
Messages
1,624
Reaction score
732
Out of curiosity, I was wondering what is required to read and understand this research paper. The person who wrote it was one of my favorite professors. Very demanding, but helpful at the same time. I was an awe watching him lecture. As a result, I chose to major in mathematics. It is more for sentimental and educational milestone purposes.

http://ejde.math.txstate.edu/Volumes/2005/84/alwash.pdf
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Presumably you want to be able to understand it ... but to what depth?

I think it would take at least 2nd year college level math to understand the first paragraph from "We consider..." through, "...an open set." But that would be understood at 2nd year college level.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
MidgetDwarf said:
Out of curiosity, I was wondering what is required to read and understand this research paper. The person who wrote it was one of my favorite professors. Very demanding, but helpful at the same time. I was an awe watching him lecture. As a result, I chose to major in mathematics. It is more for sentimental and educational milestone purposes.

http://ejde.math.txstate.edu/Volumes/2005/84/alwash.pdf

Here's a list of things I see in the paper:
- Of course ODE. But Ross' ODE book likely won't cut it, you'll need something more advanced such as Teschl http://www.mat.univie.ac.at/~gerald/ftp/book-ode/
- Complex analysis language is used freely in the paper, including Rouche's theorem. A book like Freitag-Busam should cover enough: http://www.springer.com/us/book/9783540939825
- Normed spaces would be analysis. Carothers covers this well. https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521497566/?tag=pfamazon01-20
- He uses language from topology, but I'm sure you can actually get away with not knowing topology for this.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MidgetDwarf
micromass said:
Here's a list of things I see in the paper:
- Of course ODE. But Ross' ODE book likely won't cut it, you'll need something more advanced such as Teschl http://www.mat.univie.ac.at/~gerald/ftp/book-ode/
- Complex analysis language is used freely in the paper, including Rouche's theorem. A book like Freitag-Busam should cover enough: http://www.springer.com/us/book/9783540939825
- Normed spaces would be analysis. Carothers covers this well. https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521497566/?tag=pfamazon01-20
- He uses language from topology, but I'm sure you can actually get away with not knowing topology for this.

Great, thanks Micromass. Looks like if I work hard enough, I can get an understanding of these topics in 1 year, maybe 2 years. Thank you for taking your time responding with a well structured list of topics and resources.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think you would need an introductory course in differential equations at approximately the sophomore/ junior level, an advanced course in differential equations at about the jr/sr level. Complex variablles would also ne helpful and perhaps necessary. I also had a graduate course in advanced control systems (Electrical or Aerospace Engineering) that treated this material best. To prepare for this advanced course, you should have linear control theory at the sr or graduate level. You seem just the math may not give you the sufficient background. You may need to be interdisciplinary to treat this material best