What is semi-classical level counting?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jostpuur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Counting
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of semi-classical level counting in quantum mechanics, particularly in relation to the Hilbert-Polya conjecture and the counting of energy levels below a given energy E using phase space contours. Participants explore theoretical foundations, mathematical formulations, and potential sources for further information.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant references a Wikipedia article linking the Hilbert-Polya conjecture to the counting of energy levels via phase space contours, questioning the existence of a theorem and its justification.
  • Another participant presents a theorem regarding the density of states in a quantum system, detailing the mathematical formulation involving the Dirac delta function and the trace over the Hilbert space.
  • A further contribution discusses the use of the Campbell-Baker-Hausdorff formula for approximating the time evolution operator in a specific Hamiltonian form, leading to an expression for the density of states.
  • Participants note that the total number of states with energy less than E can be expressed as an integral involving the step function, relating it to the area in phase space.
  • One participant expresses satisfaction with the explanations provided, while another seeks recommendations for books on the topic, indicating a perceived gap in existing literature on quantum theory related to these concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

While some participants agree on the existence of a theorem and the mathematical approaches discussed, there is no consensus on the ease of justification or the completeness of the explanations provided. The discussion remains open with multiple viewpoints and no definitive conclusions reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that rigorous justification of the discussed concepts can be lengthy and complex, and there may be limitations in the assumptions made during the derivations.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for those interested in advanced quantum mechanics, particularly in the context of semi-classical methods, energy level counting, and theoretical physics.

jostpuur
Messages
2,112
Reaction score
19
Wikipedia article Hilbert-Polya conjecture has a link to an article H=xp and the Riemann zeros by Berry & Keating. They mention that the number of energy levels below given [itex]E[/itex] could be counted by computing the area enclosed by the contour [itex]H(x,p)=E[/itex] in the phase space. What is that all about? Does there exist some theorem concerning this? Can it be justified easily? What information sources are there about this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, there is a general theorem. Consider a quantum system with [itex]d[/itex] degrees of freedom that is obtained by canonical quantization of a classical hamiltonian [itex]H(p,x)[/itex]. Suppose that the classical motion is bounded in phase space for energy [itex]E[/itex], so that the quantum states have discrete energy eigenvalues. Let [itex]\rho(E)dE[/itex] be the number of energy eigenstates with energy between [itex]E[/itex] and [itex]E+dE[/itex] (where [itex]dE[/itex] should be much larger than the mean spacing between energy eigenvalues, but small compared to any classically relevant energy scale). Then

[tex]\rho(E)=\int{d^dp\,d^dx\over(2\pi\hbar)^d}\,\delta<br /> \bigl(E-H(p,x)\bigr)\bigl[1+O(\hbar)\big][/tex]

where [itex]\delta[/itex] is the Dirac delta function.

To derive this, first write the exact density of states as

[tex]\rho(E)=\sum_\alpha \delta(E-E_\alpha)[/tex]

where the energy eigenstates are indexed by [itex]\alpha[/itex], and [itex]E_\alpha[/itex] is an energy eigenvalue. This can be written as

[tex]\rho(E)=\sum_\alpha \langle\alpha|\delta(E-\hat H)|\alpha\rangle[/tex]

where [itex]\hat H[/itex] is the hamiltonian operator. Then we note that [itex]\sum_\alpha\langle\alpha|\ldots|\alpha\rangle[/itex] is equivalent to a trace over the Hilbert space, so we have

[tex]\rho(E)=\mathop{\rm Tr}\delta(E-\hat H)[/tex]

Then use [itex]\delta(E)=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}{d\tau\over2\pi\hbar}\,e^{iE\tau/\hbar}[/itex] to get

[tex]\rho(E)=\mathop{\rm Tr}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}{d\tau\over2\pi\hbar}\,e^{i(E-\hat H)\tau/\hbar}=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}{d\tau\over2\pi\hbar}\,e^{iE\tau/\hbar}\mathop{\rm Tr}e^{-i\hat H\tau/\hbar}[/tex]

Now we have the trace of the time evolution operator, which can be written as a sum over position eigenstates,

[tex]{}\mathop{\rm Tr}e^{-i\hat H\tau/\hbar}=\int d^dx\,\langle x|e^{-i\hat H\tau/\hbar}|x\rangle[/tex]

(continued next post)
 
Last edited:
Now I'm going to do some hand waving. Rigorous justification is possible but lengthy.

If the hamiltonian was of the form [itex]\hat H ={1\over 2m}\hat p^2 + V(\hat x)[/itex], and we were interested in a "short" time [itex]\tau[/itex], we could use the Campbell-Baker-Hausdorf formula to write

[tex]e^{-i\hat H\tau/\hbar} = e^{-i\hat p^2\tau/2m\hbar} \,e^{-iV(\hat x)\tau/\hbar}\,e^{O(\tau^2)}[/itex]<br /> <br /> Then we could insert a complete set of momentum eigenstates to get<br /> <br /> [tex]\langle x|e^{-i\hat H\tau/\hbar}|x\rangle \approx \int d^dp\,\langle x|e^{-i\hat p^2\tau/2m\hbar}|p\rangle\langle p|e^{-iV(\hat x)\tau/\hbar}|x\rangle[/itex]<br /> <br /> Now I can remove the hats from the operators [itex]\hat p[/itex] and [itex]\hat x[/itex], because they are acting on their eigenstates, and pull these factors out front, since they are now just numbers. So we now have<br /> <br /> [tex]\langle x|e^{-i\hat H\tau/\hbar}|x\rangle \approx \int d^dp\,e^{-i(p^2/2m+V(x))\tau/\hbar}\langle x|p\rangle\langle p|x\rangle[/itex]<br /> <br /> Now I use [itex]\langle x|p\rangle=\langle p|x\rangle^*=e^{ipx/\hbar}/(2\pi\hbar)^{d/2}[/itex], and we have<br /> <br /> [tex]\langle x|e^{-i\hat H\tau/\hbar}|x\rangle \approx \int {d^dp\over\,(2\pi\hbar)^d}\,e^{-iH(p,x)\tau/\hbar}[/tex]<br /> <br /> Plugging this into our last formula for the density of states, we get<br /> <br /> [tex]\rho(E) \approx \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}{d\tau\over2\pi\hbar}\int{d^dp\,d^dx\over(2\pi\hbar)^d}\,e^{iE\tau/\hbar}\,e^{-iH(p,x)\tau/\hbar}[/tex]<br /> <br /> Now carry out the integral over [itex]\tau[/itex] to get<br /> <br /> [tex]\rho(E) \approx \int{d^dp\,d^dx\over(2\pi\hbar)^d}\,\delta<br /> \bigl(E-H(p,x)\bigr)[/tex]<br /> <br /> Ta da!<br /> <br /> Of course, I cheated, because I used a small-[itex]\tau[/itex] approximation, then integrated over all [itex]\tau[/itex]. Look up the "Gutzwiller trace formula" to see how corrections to this result (which is sometimes called the "Weyl formula") are computed.[/tex][/tex][/tex]
 
Oh, I should have mentioned: the total number of states with energy less than [itex]E[/itex] is given by

[tex]N(E)=\int_0^E dE'\,\rho(E')[/tex]

Since the integral of a delta function is a step function, we have

[tex]N(E)=\int{d^dp\,d^dx\over(2\pi\hbar)^d}\,\theta<br /> \bigl(E-H(p,x)\bigr)[/tex]

where [itex]\theta[/itex] is the step function. In one dimension, this is just the area of the [itex]x[/itex]-[itex]p[/itex] plane that is inside the contour specified by [itex]H(p,x)=E[/itex].
 
ok. Looks great. :cool:
 
Can anyone recommend a book about this topic?

It seems that most books about quantum theory don't include this kind of topics.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
13K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K