What is susceptibility in physics?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Susceptibility
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Susceptibility in physics is a material property that quantifies how easily a material can be polarized by an electric field (electric susceptibility, χe) or magnetized by a magnetic field (magnetic susceptibility, χm). In a vacuum, susceptibility is zero, while diamagnetic materials exhibit negative magnetic susceptibility, weakening magnetic fields. The equations governing these concepts include the relationships between electric field, polarization, magnetic intensity field, and magnetization, with susceptibility being dimensionless and often represented as tensors in non-isotropic materials.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and magnetic fields
  • Familiarity with polarization and magnetization concepts
  • Knowledge of tensor mathematics
  • Basic grasp of electromagnetism principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical representation of tensors in physics
  • Explore the implications of electric susceptibility in dielectric materials
  • Investigate the role of magnetic susceptibility in ferromagnetic materials
  • Learn about non-linear optics and the application of second-order susceptibility tensors
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, materials scientists, electrical engineers, and students studying electromagnetism and material properties will benefit from this discussion on susceptibility.

Messages
19,865
Reaction score
10,858
Definition/Summary

Susceptibility is a property of material. In a vacuum it is zero.

Susceptibility is an operator (generally a tensor), converting one vector field to another. It is dimensionless.

Electric susceptibility \chi_e is a measure of the ease of polarisation of a material.

Magnetic susceptibility \chi_m is a measure of the strengthening of a magnetic field in the presence of a material.

Diamagnetic material has negative magnetic susceptibility, and so weakens a magnetic field.

Equations

Electric susceptibility \chi_e and magnetic susceptibility \chi_m are the operators which convert the electric field and the magnetic intensity field, \varepsilon_0\mathbf{E} and \mathbf{H} (not the magnetic field \mathbf{B}), respectively, to the polarisation and magnetisation fields \mathbf{P} and \mathbf{M}:

\mathbf{P}\ = \chi_e\,\varepsilon_0\,\mathbf{E}

\mathbf{M}\ = \chi_m\,\mathbf{H}\ = \frac{1}{\mu_0}\,\chi_m\,(\chi_m\,+\,1)^{-1}\,\mathbf{B}\ = \frac{1}{\mu_0}\,(1\,-\,(\chi_m\,+\,1)^{-1})\,\mathbf{B}

Extended explanation

Bound charge and current:

Electric susceptibility converts \mathbf{E}, which acts on the total charge, to \mathbf{P}, which acts only on bound charge (charge which can move only locally within a material).

Magnetic susceptibility converts \mathbf{H}, which acts on free current, to \mathbf{M}, which acts only on bound current (current in local loops within a material, such as of an electron "orbiting" a nucleus).

Relative permittivity \mathbf{\varepsilon_r} and relative permeability \mathbf{\mu_r}:

\mathbf{\varepsilon_r}\ =\ \mathbf{\chi_e}\ +\ 1

\mathbf{\mu_r}\ =\ \mathbf{\chi_m}\ -\ 1

\mathbf{D}\ =\ \varepsilon_0\,\mathbf{E}\ +\ \mathbf{P}\ =\ \varepsilon_0\,(1\,+\,\mathbf{\chi_e})\,\mathbf{E}\ =\ \mathbf{\varepsilon_r}\,\mathbf{E}

\mathbf{B}\ =\ \mu_0\,(\mathbf{H}\ +\ \mathbf{M})\ =\ \mu_0\,(1\,+\,\mathbf{\chi_m})\,\mathbf{H}\ =\ \mathbf{\mu_r}\,\mathbf{H}

Note that the magnetic equations analogous to \mathbf{P}\ = \mathbf{\chi_e}\,\varepsilon_0\,\mathbf{E} and \mathbf{D}\ =\ \mathbf{\varepsilon_r}\,\mathbf{E} are \mathbf{M}\ = \frac{1}{\mu_0}\,(1\,-\,(\mathbf{\chi_m}\,+\,1)^{-1})\,\mathbf{B} and \mathbf{H}\ =\ \mathbf{\mu_r}^{-1}\,\mathbf{B}

In other words, the magnetic analogy of relative permittivity is the inverse of relative permeability, and the magnetic analogy of electric susceptibility is the inverse of a part of magnetic susceptibility.

Permittivity: \mathbf{\varepsilon}\ =\ \varepsilon_0\,\mathbf{\varepsilon_r}

Permeability: \mathbf{\mu}\ =\ \mu_0\,\mathbf{\mu_r}

Units:

Relative permittivity and relative permeability, like susceptibility, are dimensionless (they have no units).

Permittivity is measured in units of farad per metre (F.m^{-1}).

Permeability is measured in units of henry per metre (H.m^{-1}) or tesla.metre per amp or Newton per amp squared.

cgs (emu) values:

Some books which give values of susceptibility use cgs (emu) units for electromagnetism.

Although susceptibility has no units, there is still a dimensionless difference between cgs and SI values, a constant, 4\pi. To convert cgs values to SI, divide by 4\pi for electric susceptibility, and multiply by 4\pi for magnetic susceptibility.

Tensor nature of susceptibility:

For crystals and other non-isotropic material, susceptibility depends on the direction, and changes the direction, and therefore is represented by a tensor.

For isotropic material, susceptibility is the same in every direction, and \mathbf{P} (or \mathbf{M}) is in the same direction as \mathbf{E} (or \mathbf{H}):

\mathbf{P}\ = \varepsilon_0\,\chi_e\,\mathbf{E}

where \chi_e is a multiple of the unit tensor, and therefore is effectively a scalar:

P^i\ =\ \varepsilon_0\,\chi_e\,E^i


Ordinary susceptibility is a tensor (a linear operator whose components form a 3x3 matrix) which converts one vector field to another:

P^i\ =\ \varepsilon_0\,\chi_{e\ j}^{\ i}\,E^j

Second-order susceptibility is a tensor (a linear operator whose components form a 3x3x3 "three-dimensional matrix") which converts two copies of one vector field to another:

P^i\ =\ \varepsilon_0\,\chi_{e\ \ jk}^{(2)\,i}\,E^j\,E^k

It is used in non-linear optics.

Susceptibility, being a tensor, is always linear in each of its components. The adjective "non-linear" refers to the presence of two (or more) copies of \bold{E}.

More generally, one can have:

P^i\ =\ \varepsilon_0\,\sum_{n\ =\ 1}^{\infty}\chi_{e\ \ \ j_1\cdots j_n}^{(n)\,i}\,E^{j_1}\cdots E^{j_n}

* This entry is from our old Library feature. If you know who wrote it, please let us know so we can attribute a writer. Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jared Edington
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
782
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
562
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
631
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
849
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K