What is the Color of a Neutron Star?

[Jarfi]

I was wondering today what is the colour of pure neutrons confined together, I'd guess it's either completely black or white, because it doesn't have the electric orbitals needed to generate different wavelengths. I'm generally guessing it just reflects light and is therefore what... maybe a mirror?

And I am mainly meaning the matter neutrons confined, and disregarding that electrons may be flowing at the outermost layer of a neutron star.

So what is the colour of pure pressurized neutrons, but what about the neutrons star like it is inclunding the electrons flowing around and such?

Are there any studies done on this?

 

[Antiphon]

If they were simple neutrons it might be clear like glass. But in fact they are a seething complex of charged and uncharged states.

My guess is they would have something of a dark metallic shiny sheen like polished hematite. Just a guess though.

 

[Algr]

According to this thread:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=110782

The photon will eventually be emitted with lower energy, so, Brown.

 

[Antiphon]

According to this thread:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=110782

The photon will eventually be emitted with lower energy, so, Brown.

That thread doesn't say anything about this at all. So not brown.

 

[ImaLooser]

I was wondering today what is the colour of pure neutrons confined together, I'd guess it's either completely black or white, because it doesn't have the electric orbitals needed to generate different wavelengths. I'm generally guessing it just reflects light and is therefore what... maybe a mirror?

And I am mainly meaning the matter neutrons confined, and disregarding that electrons may be flowing at the outermost layer of a neutron star.

So what is the colour of pure pressurized neutrons, but what about the neutrons star like it is inclunding the electrons flowing around and such?

Are there any studies done on this?

Neutrons have no charge, so neutrons confined together would be transparent.

Neutron star cores have a few percent of electrons and protons which scatter light. I think it would be translucent like an extremely dense fog. The spectrum of the radiation would depend on the temperature of the star, which varies greatly. It is quite complicated and depends on many things, so I have no idea what temperature a very old neutron star would have. But there is so much energy kicking around in a neutron star that I think it is safe to assume that everything in the star is glowing intensely for the next quadrillion years.

 

[Vanadium 50]

Neutron stars are at millions to tens of thousands of degrees, so they would appear blue-white. Until your eyeballs melt.

 

[Naty1]

Jarfi: I don't understand what question you are asking, but I'd reply in a general way as did Vanadium...
stars are really, really, hot...so most of the 'color' you see reflects that heat.

You can see a photo of a neutron stars here and draw your own conclusions:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_star

'Confinement' may have a variety of meanings...neutrons, for example, may be 'confined' in nuclei.

I suspect that the color of any particle compressed or confined to the densities of a neutron star would reflect primarily super hot temperatures...how that relates to the particles themselves is a different issue. For example, do fusion and fission reactions have significantly different colors?? How does that reflect the particles involved?

 

[Naty1]

Neutrons have no charge, so neutrons confined together would be transparent.

What does this mean?? How is electromagnetic charge related to transparency or color??

In general charge is reflected as an additional component of total energy...a component other than beyond mc²

 

[Jarfi]

Neutrons have no charge, so neutrons confined together would be transparent.


Neutron star cores have a few percent of electrons and protons which scatter light. I think it would be translucent like an extremely dense fog. The spectrum of the radiation would depend on the temperature of the star, which varies greatly. It is quite complicated and depends on many things, so I have no idea what temperature a very old neutron star would have. But there is so much energy kicking around in a neutron star that I think it is safe to assume that everything in the star is glowing intensely for the next quadrillion years.

Okok I've read all those posts but let me address "Neutrons have no charge, so neutrons confined together would be transparent." specifically.


You say neutrons have no charge? well so do hydrogen atoms but the INNER STRUCTURE has charge, the atom is made from a - and a + charge... and the neutron is made fro 2/3 - and + charges, so according to that... an neutron HAS charges confined within it, but the whole sum of charges is zero exactly like atoms.

In order for light to be created, a charge must move, but I am very curious on how this scenario works for a single neutron, I suspect the picture taken of neutron stars with light to be originated from electron clouds surrounding the neutron star.

I am hypothetically now thinking about the neutron star matter neutrons. Without any electrons fizzing around.

Now some say transparent, but if a photon were to hit a neutron, it would hit one of the charged quarks and refract, reflect or be absorbed. It's like people are saying different answers, but is there no one academically accepted outcome of this?



and at last, I think in the end it depends on how you look at a neutron, I don't know if this has been looked at but it's also what I have been pondering... maybe the way a neutron affects a photon, depends on if the neutron IS three quarks stuck together by gluons, but if you smash them they scatter into other things... OR the neutron IS simply a neutron, and doesn't have an inner structure UNTIL you smash it so it becomes an unstable particle at that energy level and dechays into quarks and photons etc.

I don't know if this is answerable, or if you understand what I mean, but generally i mean, is the neutron a single entity until at high energies it is unstable as one and changes into quarks and more with the sum of it's energy same as the original neutron, or was the neutrons three quarks that always were there and just god loose at this temperature.

also... the notion that quarks can't exist alone must have something to do with this?


I think... that maybe the experiment of looking at how the what can I call it, grey matter in a neutron star affects light, can show us what a neutron really is, not just philosophically.


anybody have any take on this?

 

[ibysaiyan]

Don't neutron stars consist of a sea of degenerate electrons and angular momentum ?
Would that have any bearing to their EM spectrum.

 

[Naty1]

Don't neutron stars consist of a sea of degenerate electrons and angular momentum ?

Neutron stars can be thought of as protons and electrons squished into a single entity...neutrons. Theelectron degeneracy pressure has been overcome.

 

[ibysaiyan]

Neutron stars can be thought of as protons and electrons squished into a single entity...neutrons. Theelectron degeneracy pressure has been overcome.

Oh yes, that makes sense. I was getting mixed up between neutron stars and white dwarfs since they both are stabilized by degeneracy pressure.

Does this mean the star on the whole is neutral ,as someone else before me suggested (above) but how can it be like that when we know neutron stars have strong magnetic field with some going up to 1 trillion Gauss , unless there still is a fraction of electrons on the surface giving rise to the B-field ?

P.S: Sorry if my questions sounds silly...

 

[Drakkith]

Neutron stars are pretty much electrically neutral. The magnetic fields arise from a magnetohydrodynamic dynamo process.

From wikipedia's article on Magnetars: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetar

Origins of magnetic fields

The strong fields of magnetars are understood as resulting from a magnetohydrodynamic dynamo process in the turbulent, extremely dense conducting fluid that exists before the neutron star settles into its equilibrium configuration. These fields then persist due to persistent currents in a proton-superconductor phase of matter that exists at an intermediate depth within the neutron star (where neutrons predominate by mass). A similar magnetohydrodynamic dynamo process produces even more intense transient fields during coalescence of pairs of neutron stars.

 

[Chronos]

Wien's Law is the short answer. Star color is proportional to temperature. Based on this we would expect a neutron star to be in the blue-violet range with some adjustment due to gravitational redshift. Here is a NASA photo of a lone neutron star http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl...a=X&ei=RlFeUNO-F8jy0gHKz4CgAw&ved=0CDIQ9QEwBg

 

[Jarfi]

Wien's Law is the short answer. Star color is proportional to temperature. Based on this we would expect a neutron star to be in the blue-violet range with some adjustment due to gravitational redshift. Here is a NASA photo of a lone neutron star http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl...a=X&ei=RlFeUNO-F8jy0gHKz4CgAw&ved=0CDIQ9QEwBg

Ah interesting, I thought that law only applied to atoms, oh well.

 

[Drakkith]

Wien's Law is the short answer. Star color is proportional to temperature. Based on this we would expect a neutron star to be in the blue-violet range with some adjustment due to gravitational redshift. Here is a NASA photo of a lone neutron star http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl...a=X&ei=RlFeUNO-F8jy0gHKz4CgAw&ved=0CDIQ9QEwBg

Hmm. I thought we were talking about color due to reflection...

 

[ImaLooser]

Okok I've read all those posts but let me address "Neutrons have no charge, so neutrons confined together would be transparent." specifically.


You say neutrons have no charge? well so do hydrogen atoms but the INNER STRUCTURE has charge, the atom is made from a - and a + charge... and the neutron is made fro 2/3 - and + charges, so according to that... an neutron HAS charges confined within it, but the whole sum of charges is zero exactly like atoms.

In order for light to be created, a charge must move, but I am very curious on how this scenario works for a single neutron, I suspect the picture taken of neutron stars with light to be originated from electron clouds surrounding the neutron star.

I am hypothetically now thinking about the neutron star matter neutrons. Without any electrons fizzing around.

Now some say transparent, but if a photon were to hit a neutron, it would hit one of the charged quarks and refract, reflect or be absorbed. It's like people are saying different answers, but is there no one academically accepted outcome of this?



and at last, I think in the end it depends on how you look at a neutron, I don't know if this has been looked at but it's also what I have been pondering... maybe the way a neutron affects a photon, depends on if the neutron IS three quarks stuck together by gluons, but if you smash them they scatter into other things... OR the neutron IS simply a neutron, and doesn't have an inner structure UNTIL you smash it so it becomes an unstable particle at that energy level and dechays into quarks and photons etc.

I don't know if this is answerable, or if you understand what I mean, but generally i mean, is the neutron a single entity until at high energies it is unstable as one and changes into quarks and more with the sum of it's energy same as the original neutron, or was the neutrons three quarks that always were there and just god loose at this temperature.

also... the notion that quarks can't exist alone must have something to do with this?


I think... that maybe the experiment of looking at how the what can I call it, grey matter in a neutron star affects light, can show us what a neutron really is, not just philosophically.


anybody have any take on this?

Air is transparent to light but is full of charged particles. I don't understand it, but apparently the charges in the molecules cancel so that light passes through. It depends on the particular molecule and the wavelength of the light.

My guess is that neutrons might absorb very high frequency EM with very short wave lengths but certainly not visible light.

The free protons and electrons buzzing around in the neutron star core scatter the light.

Neutron star core physics is very exotic and intuition is not of much use there, but this is the best I can do.

A quark plasma IS possible and has been created at CERN. Such a thing might form in the center of a neutron star but the consensus these days is no, because the star is too cold and the pressure not quite high enough. It is quite possible that there are stable exotic particles in the center, but we do not know how much pressure there is there.

 

[ImaLooser]

Neutron stars are pretty much electrically neutral. The magnetic fields arise from a magnetohydrodynamic dynamo process.

From wikipedia's article on Magnetars: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetar

Most neutron stars are not magnetars and never have such a dynamo. Even in the magnetars the dynamo exists for only a very short time in the very early life of the star.

Neutron stars inherit part of the magnetic field of the parent star. They also generate an internal magnetic field by rotation of protons and electrons but very little is known about that.

 

[ImaLooser]

Neutron stars can be thought of as protons and electrons squished into a single entity...neutrons. Theelectron degeneracy pressure has been overcome.

Not entirely. In neutron star cores there are about 2% electrons and protons and possibly other exotic particles. This gradually blends into a crust of heavy metals and a sea and/or atmosphere of carbon. There is often a layer of hydrogen/helium from space that periodically explodes thermonuclearly.

 

[ImaLooser]

Wien's Law is the short answer. Star color is proportional to temperature. Based on this we would expect a neutron star to be in the blue-violet range with some adjustment due to gravitational redshift. Here is a NASA photo of a lone neutron star http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl...a=X&ei=RlFeUNO-F8jy0gHKz4CgAw&ved=0CDIQ9QEwBg

Neutron stars are so small that they are very difficult to see. Usually what is visible is the hot gas in the neighborhood. I did read of one case of a neutron star that was directly visible. It was unusually close to Earth and had no gas around it. I think it would be quite faint.

 

[ImaLooser]

Jarfi: I don't understand what question you are asking, but I'd reply in a general way as did Vanadium...
stars are really, really, hot...so most of the 'color' you see reflects that heat.

You can see a photo of a neutron stars here and draw your own conclusions:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_star

'Confinement' may have a variety of meanings...neutrons, for example, may be 'confined' in nuclei.

I suspect that the color of any particle compressed or confined to the densities of a neutron star would reflect primarily super hot temperatures...how that relates to the particles themselves is a different issue. For example, do fusion and fission reactions have significantly different colors?? How does that reflect the particles involved?

I think a neutron star is pretty much black body radiation with a peak. The frequency of the peak is always higher than visible light, I think, and usually much higher, so all we see is the tail of the distribution. In such cases the visible light is a sort of electric blue one may see from blue stars in the night sky. In short, the peak of the radiation may be much higher or lower in frequency, but only machines can tell the difference. To our eyes they look identical.

Ordinary stars with the peak of the radiation less than visible light look dark red. The cosmic microwave background left over from the Big Bang is so cold and has a peak so low that virtually no light is visible. It was not always that way, though. After the Big Bang the entire Universe was crammed with bluish visible light. Over time this faded away to intense yellow light that was absolutely everywhere, then red, then this light slowly disappeared entirely from sight. It is still there, though.

 

[Jarfi]

Hmm. I thought we were talking about color due to reflection...

Yes I was also talking about that, I was trying to find out if we had only the neutron matter, say we had a ball of ONLY neutrons, and just measured the way those pressurised neutrons effect light. I am suspecting this white blue light is coming from electrons from the outermost layer of the star, and the neutrons within have nothing to do with it.

 

[Jarfi]

Air is transparent to light but is full of charged particles. I don't understand it, but apparently the charges in the molecules cancel so that light passes through. It depends on the particular molecule and the wavelength of the light.

My guess is that neutrons might absorb very high frequency EM with very short wave lengths but certainly not visible light.

The free protons and electrons buzzing around in the neutron star core scatter the light.

Neutron star core physics is very exotic and intuition is not of much use there, but this is the best I can do.

A quark plasma IS possible and has been created at CERN. Such a thing might form in the center of a neutron star but the consensus these days is no, because the star is too cold and the pressure not quite high enough. It is quite possible that there are stable exotic particles in the center, but we do not know how much pressure there is there.

Yes.. but there is one thing you forget.

In neutron stars the particles are literally next to each other, there is no space in between for light to flow by.

The reason air and glass is transparent is because of the large with between atoms, so that the lightwave can go trough it like a seawave trough rocks.

If the light strikes a wall of neutrons, it must be interfered or collapse somewhere on one neutron, Most of you are talking about the star being white, but I don't think that's because of neutrons, I think that's simply the electrons in the outermost layer or even gas.

 

[Jarfi]

I think a neutron star is pretty much black body radiation with a peak. The frequency of the peak is always higher than visible light, I think, and usually much higher, so all we see is the tail of the distribution. In such cases the visible light is a sort of electric blue one may see from blue stars in the night sky. In short, the peak of the radiation may be much higher or lower in frequency, but only machines can tell the difference. To our eyes they look identical.

Ordinary stars with the peak of the radiation less than visible light look dark red. The cosmic microwave background left over from the Big Bang is so cold and has a peak so low that virtually no light is visible. It was not always that way, though. After the Big Bang the entire Universe was crammed with bluish visible light. Over time this faded away to intense yellow light that was absolutely everywhere, then red, then this light slowly disappeared entirely from sight. It is still there, though.

Yes but does black body radiation abide to neutrons, or simply anything else than atoms?

 

[Naty1]

I thought we were talking about color due to reflection...

This and subsequent posts reflect my earlier comment about the exact nature of the original question not being clear.

black body radiation abide to neutrons, or simply anything else than atoms?

a black body is a black body...its TEMPERATURE that matters.

 

[Jarfi]

This and subsequent posts reflect my earlier comment about the exact nature of the original question not being clear.



a black body is a black body...its TEMPERATURE that matters.

Originally the question was about the nature of the main matter that is in neutron stars, that is pressurized neutrons. There was also one about how the star itself looks, but that one was answered with it being very hot and therefore glowing, I myself suspected that being from hot gas and plasma around the neutrons, but not the neutrons making the light.

The question on how pure neutrons, a pure wall of neutrons would affect light is yet unclear. I'm guessing studying that would be extremely hard, since it's not possible to replicate in a lab.

 

[Antiphon]

Yes.. but there is one thing you forget.

In neutron stars the particles are literally next to each other, there is no space in between for light to flow by.

The reason air and glass is transparent is because of the large with between atoms, so that the lightwave can go trough it like a seawave trough rocks.

If the light strikes a wall of neutrons, it must be interfered or collapse somewhere on one neutron, Most of you are talking about the star being white, but I don't think that's because of neutrons, I think that's simply the electrons in the outermost layer or even gas.

This is all wrong. Light doesn't flow like water between rocks. If a neutron has vanishing charge, light will not react with it. It will go right through it. The spacing of glass atoms has nothing to do with light going through. If it did, light would go through stones and steel just as easily.

We all agree the radiated color of an object mostly depends on its temperature and emissivity spectrum.

The real question is, what does a cold black hole look like?

 

[Jarfi]

This is all wrong. Light doesn't flow like water between rocks. If a neutron has vanishing charge, light will not react with it. It will go right through it. The spacing of glass atoms has nothing to do with light going through. If it did, light would go through stones and steel just as easily.

We all agree the radiated color of an object mostly depends on its temperature and emissivity spectrum.

The real question is, what does a cold black hole look like?

Yes but what about the charged quarks inside the neutrons? as with metals, the whole charge is always zero, but the regional charges are not, what about quarks creating regional electric charges in a single neutron?

 

[Antiphon]

Yes but what about the charged quarks inside the neutrons? as with metals, the whole charge is always zero, but the regional charges are not, what about quarks creating regional electric charges in a single neutron?

Not relevant to optical processes. The energy is too low to excite significant resonances. The molecular and atomic bonds have the right energy for this.

 

[Jarfi]

Not relevant to optical processes. The energy is too low to excite significant resonances. The molecular and atomic bonds have the right energy for this.

So the ending conclusion is that the neutron "rock" is transparent? that's pretty damn awesome, and than the plasma and maybe hydrogen gas flowing massively hot around the star, blasting white light away... sounds cool to me.