MHB What is the Common Core method for solving 2x + 3x?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The Common Core method for solving 2x + 3x emphasizes understanding algebraic concepts through arithmetic relationships. The straightforward answer to 2x + 3x is 5x, but the discussion critiques an unconventional breakdown of the equation that seems overly complicated. Participants express skepticism about the validity of the presented method, questioning its authenticity and relevance to Common Core standards. A request for credible sources or citations regarding this method is made, highlighting a lack of clarity in its educational purpose. Overall, the conversation underscores the need for clarity and accuracy in teaching methods associated with Common Core.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
When we add 2x + 3x the answer is 5x.

Commore Core Way:

2x + 3x = what?

2 = 3 - 1

3 = 4 - 1

5 = 6 - 1

x = x^1

(3 -1)(x^1) + (4 - 1)(x^1)

Answer:

(6 - 1)(x^1)

Ridiculous! Agree?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You have repeatedly stated a number or things without giving any indication of where you got them. I have dealt with "common core" for some time and I have never seen anything like what you give. Where did you see this? Can you give a citation or, better, a "common core" website that says that?

I will say that what you give would be a ridiculous way to actually calculate, I could see it as a way of introducing students to algebraic ideas, relating the to arithmetic. Letting us see where you saw that would help us determine exactly what the purpose was.
 
My friend's daughter was given 2x + 3x to add for homework via Common Core in her 6th grade class.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top