What is the Correct Method for Deriving p = γmv?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 4K views
physics user1
I thought this mental experiment: consider an inertial frame of reference solidal to a particle moving with velocity v respect to another inertial frame of reference, i got to find the momentum in the second frame of reference (in the first is 0 since is solidal with the particle)

p= m* dx/dt

And then i plug instead of x and t the lorentz tranformation thwt connects them with t' and x'...

But it doesn't work, where am i wrong? Is that method correct? If not why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That doesn't work, because the (spatial component of the!) relativistic momentum is p = ymv to start with. You should transform the 4-momentum. This 4-momentum is defined by the relativistic action of a point particle.
 
The idea is to find an expression that:
  • is conserved in closed systems (and additive) even when ##v \rightarrow c##,
  • increases in magnitude without bound as ##v \rightarrow c## (because otherwise it would have a maximum limit like ##v## does, and this would contradict the first criterion), and
  • reduces to ##\mathbf{p} \approx m \mathbf{v}## in the classical limit.
The famous Tolman/Lewis thought experiment demonstrates that if such a quantity exists, then it must be ##\mathbf{p} = \gamma m \mathbf{v}##, which obviously meets the second and third criteria. See here: https://books.google.com/books?id=FrgVDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA76.

As for the first criterion, experiment verifies that this vector is indeed conserved at all possible values of ##v##. (Think particle accelerators.)