What is the correct way to measure an electron's spin in a magnetic field?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ^_^physicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measurements
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on measuring an electron's spin in a magnetic field, specifically when the field is aligned along the x-axis. The Hamiltonian operator is defined as -g*|B|*h/2 *Sx, and the initial state-vector is represented as a linear combination of the eigenvectors associated with this Hamiltonian. The confusion arises when attempting to measure Sz after evolving the system, as the participants debate whether the expectation value constitutes a valid measurement. Clarification is needed regarding the distinction between expectation values and actual measurement outcomes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum mechanics fundamentals
  • Understanding of Hamiltonian operators
  • Knowledge of spin operators (Sx and Sz)
  • Familiarity with wave-function representation and eigenvectors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Hamiltonian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the measurement postulates in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the implications of commutation relations between operators
  • Investigate the concept of expectation values versus measurement outcomes
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists focusing on particle physics, and anyone interested in the measurement theory of quantum systems.

^_^physicist
Messages
231
Reaction score
1
So I've gotten myself stumped the other day.

Suppose I have an electron in a magnetic field, where the field is oriented along the x-axis, than I know that the H-matrix/operator is defined as -g*|B|*h/2 *Sx. Now say I know that I have a wave-function in a known initial state-vector, let's call is A. I can express A as a linear combination of the two eigenvectors associated with the H-matrix. Ok that seems fine, I can make a measurement of <A|H|A> and that's great. And if I want to let the system evolve in time I just stick the energy eigenvalues into the evolution (exp[-iEt/h]). But let's say I want to make a measurement of Sz now that I have the energy of the system after a short time.

Now I get myself confused, since H commutes with any S can't I just take the state-vector A, expressed as a linear combination of H's eigenvectors, and operate Sz on A to determine the expectation of Sz? When I ask some of my classmates we end up having a disagreement on whether or not this a viable measurement or not, and if it is if I am adding complications or not.

Any help on clearing this up would be great.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
^_^physicist said:
Ok that seems fine, I can make a measurement of <A|H|A> and that's great

I guess you did not get any reply till now, because your question is not very clear. For instance you say "I can make a measurement of <A|H|A> ". Now, <A|H|A> is an expectation value. It is neither a measurement nor a result of a single measurement. Perhaps if you edit your question so that it becomes really precise, then you will get some feedback.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K