What is the difference between inverse and reciprocal functions?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter KingNothing
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Mean
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concepts of inverse and reciprocal functions, exploring their definitions, notations, and the potential for confusion between the two. Participants examine the mathematical properties of inverse functions, particularly in the context of specific examples, and clarify the distinction between inverse functions and multiplicative inverses.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the meaning of "inverse," noting confusion between the "undoing" function and the idea of "1 over" a function.
  • Another participant clarifies that the inverse of a function is defined as a function that undoes the original function, emphasizing that it is not simply found by taking the reciprocal.
  • A definition of inverse functions is provided, stating that for a function f(x), its inverse f^{-1}(x) satisfies f(f^{-1}(x)) = x.
  • It is asserted that "inverse" does not mean "1 over" a function, which is instead referred to as the multiplicative inverse or reciprocal.
  • Participants discuss notation for expressing the reciprocal of a function and raising a function to a power, suggesting that (f(x))^2 is a clearer notation for squaring the function.
  • A participant shares their experience teaching mathematics in sign language, highlighting the need to differentiate between the concepts of inverse and reciprocal in their teaching methods.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the definitions of inverse and reciprocal functions, but there is some confusion regarding notation and terminology. The discussion reflects multiple viewpoints on how to express these concepts clearly.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved nuances regarding the notation used for reciprocal functions and the potential for misunderstanding in teaching contexts. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the best practices for notation.

KingNothing
Messages
880
Reaction score
4
What exactly does inverse mean? I've seen it mean the "undoing" function, and also simply meaning "1 over" a function.

Consider the function [tex]f(x)=4x + 6[/tex]
Is the "inverse" [tex]f^{-1}(x)=\frac{x-6}{4}[/tex]
or is it [tex]f^{-1}(x)=\frac{1}{4x+6}[/tex]?

I'm getting kinda confused. It doesn't help that inverse trig functions are annotated with a [tex]^{-1}[/tex], when those are actually the 'undoing' functions.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In the context of a function, the inverse of a function is another function which "undoes" it.

In general, it is definitely not found by simply dividing one by the function. The easiest way to find the inverse is to solve the function f(x) = x for x, then rename the variables. The first answer you provided is the correct answer.

- Warren
 
Here is the definition of inverse function from mathworld: Given a function f(x), its inverse [itex]f^{-1}(x)[/itex] is defined by [itex]f(f^{-1}(x)) = f^{-1}(f(x)) \equiv x[/itex] Source: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/InverseFunction.html

So, the inverse of [itex]f(x)=4x + 6[/itex] is what you wrote first: [itex]f^{-1}(x)=\frac{x-6}{4}[/itex] (which chroot explained how to find)

[itex]f^{-1}(x)[/itex] means inverse of f(x), not [tex]\frac{1}{f(x)}[/tex]

So if we compute [itex]f(f^{-1}(x))[/itex]

We get [itex]f(f^{-1}(x)) = f(\frac{x-6}{4}) = 4(\frac{x-6}{4}) + 6 = x - 6 + 6 = x[/itex] which is what we should get, and if we compute [itex]f^{-1}(f(x))[/itex] we should, and will, get x as well.
 
Last edited:
"Inverse", alone, does not ever mean "1 over" a function! That would be the "multiplicative inverse" or reciprocal, just as "negative 1 times" a function would be the "additive inverse" or negative of a function.

The "inverse function" is always the inverse of the composition operation.
 
Hmm, alright, that explains things quite a bit more! So, branching off what's been said, is there a proper way to denote [tex]\frac{1}{f(x)}[/tex] or is that the only way? What about [tex]f(x)[/tex] raised to different powers, such as squared, do you denote this as [tex]f^{2}(x)[/tex]?
 
KingNothing said:
Hmm, alright, that explains things quite a bit more! So, branching off what's been said, is there a proper way to denote [tex]\frac{1}{f(x)}[/tex] or is that the only way? What about [tex]f(x)[/tex] raised to different powers, such as squared, do you denote this as [tex]f^{2}(x)[/tex]?

Putting a positive exponent after the f usually means "raise the result to the power of. But notations change slightly depending on what you're working with, so it's usually a good idea to write it as:

[tex](f(x))^2[/tex]
 
Yes, it's an unfortunate notation! I think most people would understand [itex]f^{-1}(x)[/itex] to be inverse function, [itex](f(x))^{-1}[/itex] to be reciprocal.

By the way, I teach mathematics in sign language (Gallaudet University in Washington, D.C.). Whenever I introduce the idea of inverse function, I always have to correct students who want to sign it as "reciprocal" (hold out the index and middle fingers horizontally, in a sideways v, the twist your wrist to flip the two fingers over) and insist that the sign as "change" done in reverse. "Change": hold index and thumb of each hand together- the two hands together at your chest- rotate, right hand rotating forward, left backward. "inverse" same hand position, left hand rotates forward, right backward.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K