What is the efficiency of a Hobson's joint?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stormer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Efficiency Joint
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the efficiency of a Hobson's joint, a type of gearless angled drive. Participants explore its practical efficiency, factors influencing it, and potential applications, with a focus on theoretical and practical considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the Hobson's joint as a gearless angled drive, noting its limited applications and suggesting that efficiency depends on factors like friction and load.
  • Another participant proposes calculating the output torque based on frictionless connections, indicating that efficiency may vary with angle.
  • A participant questions the assumption of frictionless connections, suggesting that this would imply 100% efficiency, similar to other gears without friction.
  • It is suggested that the efficiency of the Hobson's joint is not constant, potentially following a square or exponential function of torque due to compounded side forces and critical alignment tolerances.
  • Concerns are raised about the reliability of the Hobson's joint for power transfer, with one participant arguing that it may wear rapidly and is not suitable for long-term work, suggesting alternative solutions may be more durable.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the efficiency and reliability of the Hobson's joint, with no consensus reached regarding its practical applications or performance metrics.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the dependence of efficiency on factors such as friction, load, and alignment, but do not resolve the mathematical implications or provide specific efficiency values.

Stormer
Messages
121
Reaction score
23
A Hobson's joint is a kind of gearless angled drive. Most often a fixed 90 degree angle, but there is also versions with free moving joints in each axle so it can move to any angle up to a little over 90 degrees. It is today mostly just a novelty and there is very few applications actually using it because a bevel gear or similar is used in stead.

e51fd18fc2054d7d90084dcb73741735.jpg




But how efficient is actually this drive in practice? I know it depends on the friction of the bushings the axles ride in and the load, but what is a ballpark number? For example for some polished stainless axles running in PTFE or oilite bushings (there is usually to small of a space to fit ball bearing linear guides) with "moderate" loads and low speed? I have searched but not found any reliable numbers.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 256bits
Engineering news on Phys.org
I suggest that you work it out for yourself, initially based on frictionless connections. If you apply a torque T1 to the input, what is the output torque, T2? I have not worked this out, but I think you will find that it is angle dependent.
 
Dr.D said:
initially based on frictionless connections
Will that not just make it 100% efficient? Just like all other gears assuming no friction...
 
The efficiency is not constant, but will be a square or an exponential function of the torque. That is because side forces on the links are compounded from one end of the sleeve to misalign the other.

There is a critical alignment tolerance at which it will lock rather than slide. That is the arctangent of the friction coefficient. If the angle is greater than the critical angle, the rod will stick and not slide in the sleeve. Since the rod force is always concentrated at the same two points, the surfaces of the sleeve and rod will wear rapidly, to approach the critical angle.

Poor lubrication will result in fatigue of the sliding link elbows. There is no redundancy.

I do not think this is a reliable power transfer device. There are more durable solutions that weigh less. It might be used to transfer orientation information, but it cannot be expected to do real work for any long period.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman, Lnewqban and Spinnor

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 112 ·
4
Replies
112
Views
23K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K