What Is the Expression for Circular Wave Displacement in a Pond?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding an expression for the displacement of a circular wave generated by a stone dropped into a pond, focusing on theoretical aspects and mathematical representations in an ideal fluid scenario. Participants explore various wave functions and their applicability to the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks an expression for the displacement of a circular wave, specifically eta(x,y,t), under ideal fluid conditions.
  • Another participant suggests that Bessel, Hankel, and Airy functions are suitable for cylindrical wave functions, proposing Hankel functions as the most appropriate for traveling cylindrical waves.
  • There is a discussion on how Hankel functions solve the Laplace equation in cylindrical coordinates, indicating their relevance to propagating circular waves.
  • One participant questions how to derive the surface displacement from Hankel functions and speculates about the displacement's behavior, suggesting it may vanish at a rate proportional to 1/r.
  • Another participant corrects the assumption about the rate of falloff, stating that energy density falls off at a rate proportional to 1/r, while amplitude falls off at a rate proportional to 1/√r, linking this to the asymptotic behavior of Bessel functions.
  • There is a query about converting the asymptotic form of the Bessel function to polar coordinates for practical use in finding displacement.
  • A participant notes that Hankel functions, being combinations of Bessel functions, may lead to singularities at r=0 and suggests that the result should primarily involve Bessel functions in this context.
  • Another participant mentions the distinction between Bessel and Hankel functions in electromagnetics, emphasizing their different roles in wave equations depending on boundary conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriate mathematical functions to use and the implications of singularities in the context of the problem. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact expression for displacement and the best approach to derive it.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the applicability of various wave functions and the conditions under which they are valid. The discussion also highlights potential complexities in deriving a simple expression for displacement.

scepter
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi all.
I´m looking for an expression for displacement of the waveform, eta(x,y,t) , of a circular wave that is created when a stone is dropped into a pond. Simplest case, assuming an ideal fluid and neglecting non-linear effects.

Thanks,

/scepter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are purely interested in cylindrical wave functions, Bessel, Hankel and Airy functions are all appropriate wave functions. I would think a Hankel function is most appropriate, a traveling cylindrical wave. As to the specific application of waves on the surface of a fluid, I am ignorant of the solution to that particular problem.
 
The Hankel functions solves the Laplace equation for the velocity potential in cylindrical coordinates, so it describes a propagating circular wave.
How do I go about finding the expression for the surface displacement from the Hankel functions?
Is there no simpler way? I imagine the displacement must vanish at a rate proportional to 1/r, where r is the distance from the origin.
 
scepter said:
The Hankel functions solves the Laplace equation for the velocity potential in cylindrical coordinates, so it describes a propagating circular wave.
How do I go about finding the expression for the surface displacement from the Hankel functions?
Is there no simpler way? I imagine the displacement must vanish at a rate proportional to 1/r, where r is the distance from the origin.
Actually it's the energy (density) that falls off at a rate proportional to 1/r, so the amplitude falls off at a rate proportional to [itex]1/ \sqrt{r}[/itex]. And that corresponds exactly to the asymptotic behaviour of the Bessel function (for large x).

[tex]J_m(x) \simeq \sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi x}} \cos(x - \frac{m \pi}{4} - \frac{\pi}{4})[/tex]

Edit. Should be :

[tex]J_m(x) \simeq \sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi x}} \cos(x - \frac{m \pi}{2} - \frac{\pi}{4})[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Ok, I see.
So to find the displacement at some distance away from the origin, which is what I`m interested in, I could use this asymptotic form of the Bessel function. Do I need to somehow convert it to polar coordinates?
I take it that there is no available simple expression for the displacement that contains the Bessel function? Maybe someone could outline the procedures for arriving at the displacement formula?
 
Since Hankel functions are a combination of Bessel functions J and Y, with this case, there would be a singularity at r=0 for Y and thus the result should be a function of J. The only places I have sen Henkel functions arise is in situations where there is no interest in the r=0 case, i.e. annular ducts, incident flows or a pulsating source.

uart: You may want to check your equation for the asymptotic expansion of Jn. Your second cosine term should be [tex]\frac{m \pi}{2}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
FredGarvin said:
Since Hankel functions are a combination of Bessel functions J and Y, with this case, there would be a singularity at r=0 for Y and thus the result should be a function of J. The only places I have sen Henkel functions arise is in situations where there is no interest in the r=0 case, i.e. annular ducts, incident flows or a pulsating source.

uart: You may want to check your equation for the asymptotic expansion of Jn. Your second cosine term should be [tex]\frac{m \pi}{2}[/tex]

In electromagnetics, the Bessel function is a standing wave and the Hankel function is a traveling wave. The wave equation that would arise with a line sourc such as the OP's would be a Hankel function unless he required a reflecting boundary.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K