MHB What is the Factorial Expression for (ax + b)^(-1/2) - [sqrt{ax + b}]/b?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expression
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on simplifying the expression (ax + b)^(-1/2) - [sqrt{ax + b}]/b using rational exponents. The initial approach involves rewriting the expression with rational exponents and factoring out terms with smaller exponents. A participant mentions using b^0 as a placeholder to facilitate factoring, highlighting that this technique is a matter of personal preference. The conversation emphasizes that different methods of simplification can vary based on individual style. Overall, the thread illustrates the complexities of factoring and simplifying algebraic expressions.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Factor

(ax + b)^(-1/2) - [sqrt{ax + b}]/b

This one is tricky. Can someone get me started?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would begin by using rational exponents in place of the radical notation:

$$(ax+b)^{-\frac{1}{2}}-\frac{\sqrt{ax+b}}{b}=b^0(ax+b)^{-\frac{1}{2}}-b^{-1}(ax+b)^{\frac{1}{2}}$$

Next, continue, using the technique I explained in your other recent threads...you now have two factors in each expression in the given difference, so begin by factoring out those with the smaller exponents. :D
 
Where did b^0 come from?
 
RTCNTC said:
Where did b^0 come from?

That's just a placeholder to make factoring a little easier...once you get more practice you won't need it. Also, it's part of how I choose to factor, and not absolutely necessary. For example, if I have the expression:

$$a+\frac{a}{b}$$

Then I would choose to factor as:

$$\frac{a}{b}(b+1)$$

rather than:

$$a\left(1+\frac{1}{b}\right)$$

Much of simplifying expressions can simply be personal preference. :D
 
I will work on this later..
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top