What is the general form of Powers of Polylogarithms?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter alyafey22
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the general form of powers of polylogarithms, specifically the integral representation $$L^m_n (a) = \int^1_0 x^{a-1} \mathrm{Li}_{\, n}(x)^m \, dx$$. Special cases are explored, including $$\text{Li}_{p,q}(m, n; a, z)$$ and its relation to integration by parts. The participants also discuss the infinite sum $$\mathscr{C}(\alpha , k)$$ and its general formula, highlighting the symmetric property $$\mathscr{H}(\alpha,\beta) = \mathscr{H}(\beta,\alpha)$$. The conversation concludes with references to relevant literature, including a paper by Pedro Freitas on polylog integrals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polylogarithms, specifically $$\mathrm{Li}_n(x)$$
  • Familiarity with integration techniques, particularly integration by parts
  • Knowledge of series and summation, including the Riemann zeta function $$\zeta(s)$$
  • Basic grasp of mathematical notation and integral calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and applications of polylogarithms in number theory
  • Study integration techniques involving special functions, focusing on integration by parts
  • Explore the Riemann zeta function and its significance in analytic number theory
  • Investigate the G-Barnes function and its connections to polylogarithmic integrals
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, researchers in number theory, and students studying special functions and integrals, particularly those interested in polylogarithms and their applications.

alyafey22
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,556
Reaction score
2
We should consider the general form

$$L^m_n (a) = \int^1_0 x^{a-1} \mathrm{Li}_{\, n}(x)^m \, dx$$​

This is NOT a tutorial , any attempts or comments are always welcomed.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The case $$m=1$$ and $$a>0 \in \mathbb{R}$$ is fairly straightforward. Additionally, if we generalize your integral to$$\text{Li}_{p,q}(m, n; a, z)=\int_0^zx^{a-1} (\text{Li}_p(x))^m (\text{Li}_q(x))^n\,dx$$Then the special cases$$\text{Li}_{p,q}(1, 1; 0, z)=\int_0^z \frac{ \text{Li}_p(x) \text{Li}_q(x) }{x}\,dx$$

require nothing more than repeated integration by parts, provided $$p+q \in 2\mathbb{N}+1$$, since$$\frac{d}{dx} \text{Li}_p(x)=\frac{\text{Li}_{p-1}(x)}{x}$$So, for example, we have:$$(01) \quad \int_0^z \frac{ \text{Li}_1(x) \text{Li}_2(x) }{x}\,dx= \frac{1}{2} \text{Li}_2(z)^2$$

$$(02) \quad \int_0^z \frac{ \text{Li}_2(x) \text{Li}_3(x) }{x}\,dx= \frac{1}{2} \text{Li}_3(z)^2$$

$$(03) \quad \int_0^z \frac{ \text{Li}_3(x) \text{Li}_4(x) }{x}\,dx= \frac{1}{2}
\text{Li}_4(z)^2$$Integrating (02) by parts also gives:$$(04) \quad \int_0^z \frac{ \text{Li}_1(x) \text{Li}_4(x) }{x}\,dx= \text{Li}_2(z) \text{Li}_4(z) - \frac{1}{2} \text{Li}_3(z)^2$$Similarly, an integration by parts of (03) gives$$(05) \quad \int_0^z \frac{ \text{Li}_2(x) \text{Li}_5(x) }{x}\,dx= \text{Li}_3(z) \text{Li}_5(z) - \frac{1}{2} \text{Li}_4(z)^2$$as well as$$(06) \quad \int_0^z \frac{ \text{Li}_1(x) \text{Li}_6(x) }{x}\,dx= $$

$$\text{Li}_2(z) \text{Li}_6(z)- \text{Li}_3(z) \text{Li}_5(z) + \frac{1}{2} \text{Li}_4(z)^2$$
 
Last edited:
Hey DW , thanks for your input (which I always wait for). I think the generalization you put is interesting to look at.

I was playing a little bit with these integrals and found interesting to look at the infinite sum

$$\mathscr{C}(\alpha , k) =\sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{1}{n^{\alpha}(n+k)}\,\,\, ; \,\,\,\,\mathscr{C}(1, k)=\frac{H_k}{k} $$

We can find a general formula to find the sum

\begin{align}
\mathscr{C}(\alpha , k) &=\sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{1}{k\, n^{\alpha-1}}\left( \frac{1}{n}-\frac{1}{n+k}\right)\\ &= \frac{1}{k}\zeta(\alpha)-\frac{1}{k}\mathscr{C}(\alpha-1 , k)\\ &= \frac{1}{k}\zeta(\alpha)-\frac{1}{k^2}\zeta(\alpha-1)+\frac{1}{k^2}\mathscr{C}(\alpha-2 , k)\\ &= \sum_{n=1}^{\alpha-1}(-1)^{n-1}\frac{\zeta(\alpha-n+1)}{k^n}+(-1)^{\alpha-1}\frac{H_k}{k^\alpha}
\end{align}

Hence we have the general formula

$$\mathscr{C}(\alpha , k) = \sum_{n=1}^{\alpha-1}(-1)^{n-1}\frac{\zeta(\alpha-n+1)}{k^n}+(-1)^{\alpha-1}\frac{H_k}{k^\alpha}$$

Dividing by $$\frac{1}{k^{\beta}}$$ and summing w.r.t to $k$ we have

$$\sum_{k\geq 1}\frac{\mathscr{C}(\alpha , k)}{k^{\beta}} = \sum_{n=1}^{\alpha-1}(-1)^{n-1}\zeta(\alpha-n+1)\zeta(\beta+n)+(-1)^{\alpha-1}\sum_{k\geq 1}\frac{H_k}{k^{\alpha+\beta}}$$

Now we use that

$$\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{H_n}{n^q}= \left(1+\frac{q}{2} \right)\zeta(q+1)-\frac{1}{2}\sum_{k=1}^{q-2}\zeta(k+1)\zeta(q-k)$$

Hence we have

$$\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{H_n}{n^{\alpha+\beta}}= \left(1+\frac{{\alpha+\beta}}{2} \right)\zeta({\alpha+\beta}+1)-\frac{1}{2}\sum_{k=1}^{{\alpha+\beta}-2}\zeta(k+1)\zeta({\alpha+\beta}-k)$$

And the generalization is the following formula

\begin{align}
\sum_{k\geq 1}\frac{\mathscr{C}(\alpha , k)}{k^{\beta}} &= \sum_{n=1}^{\alpha-1}(-1)^{n-1}\zeta(\alpha-n+1)\zeta(\beta+n) -\frac{1}{2}\sum_{n=1}^{{\alpha+\beta}-2}(-1)^{\alpha-1}\zeta(n+1)\zeta({\alpha+\beta}-n)\\ &+(-1)^{\alpha-1}\left(1+\frac{{\alpha+\beta}}{2} \right)\zeta({\alpha+\beta}+1)\end{align}

Interestingly we also have that

$$\sum_{k\geq 1}\frac{\mathscr{C}(\alpha , k)}{k^{\beta}}=\sum_{k\geq 1}\frac{\mathscr{C}(\beta, k)}{k^{\alpha}}$$

Generally we will use the symbol

$$\mathscr{H}(\alpha,\beta)=\sum_{k\geq 1}\frac{\mathscr{C}(\alpha , k)}{k^{\beta}}$$

So we have the symmetric property

$$\mathscr{H}(\alpha,\beta) = \mathscr{H}(\beta,\alpha)$$

$$\mathscr{H}(1,\beta)= \left(1+\frac{{\beta}}{2} \right)\zeta({\beta}+1)-\frac{1}{2}\sum_{k=1}^{{\beta}-2}\zeta(k+1)\zeta({\beta}-k)$$

Wasn't that fun , yes it was. I'll have to check my work because I might have some errors.
 
ZaidAlyafey said:
Hey DW , thanks for your input (which I always wait for). I think the generalization you put is interesting to look at.

Thanks Zaid! The feeling's mutual. Very much so. :D
ZaidAlyafey said:
Wasn't that fun , yes it was. I'll have to check my work because I might have some errors.
Certainly was... ;)Incidentally, I saw a paper some years ago on arXiv that dealt with Polylog Integrals of the exact same type as I posted above, but where $$p+q \in 2\mathbb{N}
$$Can't seem to find it now, but the author used Euler Sums to evaluate them (nudge, nudge, wink, wink... ;) )
 
DreamWeaver said:
Incidentally, I saw a paper some years ago on arXiv that dealt with Polylog Integrals of the exact same type as I posted above, but where $$p+q \in 2\mathbb{N}
$$Can't seem to find it now, but the author used Euler Sums to evaluate them (nudge, nudge, wink, wink... ;) )

Really , that would be interesting if you can find it. Generally, I can find a general formula for the integral

$$\int^1_0 \frac{\mathrm{Li}_n(x) \mathrm{Li}_m(x)}{x}\, dx $$

which is related to $$\mathscr{H}(\alpha ,\beta)$$. Will post that when I have time. Currently I read about the G-Barnes function which is really interesting to play with.
 
ZaidAlyafey said:
Really , that would be interesting if you can find it. Generally, I can find a general formula for the integral

$$\int^1_0 \frac{\mathrm{Li}_n(x) \mathrm{Li}_m(x)}{x}\, dx $$

which is related to $$\mathscr{H}(\alpha ,\beta)$$. Will post that when I have time. Currently I read about the G-Barnes function which is really interesting to play with.
I'll keep trying to find that old paper, and will let you know if I have any luck.Likewise, I look forward to your general solution to

$$\int^1_0 \frac{\mathrm{Li}_n(x) \mathrm{Li}_m(x)}{x}\, dx $$

as and when you have time. (Yes)
 
We find series and integral representations of $$\mathscr{H}(\alpha,\beta)$$

$$\mathscr{H}(p,q)=\sum_{k\geq 1}\frac{\mathscr{C}(p,k)}{k^{q}}= \sum_{k\geq 1}\sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{1}{k^{q}n^{p}(n+k)}$$

Also we have

$$\mathscr{H}(p,q)= \int^1_0 \frac{\mathrm{Li}_p(x)\,\, \mathrm{Li}_q(x)\, }{x}\, dx $$

So we have the following

\begin{align}
\mathscr{H}(p,q)=\int^1_0 \frac{\mathrm{Li}_p(x)\,\, \mathrm{Li}_q(x)\, }{x}\, dx&= \sum_{n=1}^{p-1}(-1)^{n-1}\zeta(p-n+1)\zeta(q+n) -\frac{1}{2}\sum_{n=1}^{{p+q}-2}(-1)^{p-1}\zeta(n+1)\zeta({p+q}-n)\\ &+(-1)^{p-1}\left(1+\frac{{p+q}}{2} \right)\zeta({p+q}+1)\end{align}

Now for the special case $$p=q$$ we have

\begin{align}
\mathscr{H}(q,q)=\int^1_0 \frac{ \mathrm{Li}_q(x) ^2 \, }{x}\, dx&= \sum_{n=1}^{q-1}(-1)^{n-1}\zeta(q-n+1)\zeta(q+n) -\frac{1}{2}\sum_{n=1}^{{2q}-2}(-1)^{q-1}\zeta(n+1)\zeta({2q}-n)\\ &+(-1)^{q-1}\left(1+q \right)\zeta(2q+1)\end{align}

We have for the special case $$q=2$$

$$\mathscr{H}(2,2)=\int^1_0 \frac{ \mathrm{Li}_2(x) ^2 \, }{x}\, dx=2\zeta(3)\zeta(2)-3\zeta(5)$$
 
An interesting form that I wasn't able to solve is the following

$$\int^1_0 \frac{\mathrm{Li}_{q-1}(x)\mathrm{Li}_{q}(x)\mathrm{Li}_{q+1}(x)}{x}\, dx \,\,\,\, q>1$$​

For simplicity we can consider

$$\int^1_0 \frac{\mathrm{Li}_{1}(x)\mathrm{Li}_{2}(x)\mathrm{Li}_{3}(x)}{x}\, dx $$​
 
Excellent work, Zaid! (Yes)
 
  • #10
Consider the following integral

$$ \int^1_0 \frac{\mathrm{Li}_{q-1}(x)\mathrm{Li}_{q}(x)\mathrm{Li}_{q+1}(x)}{x}\, dx $$

Integrating by parts we obtain

$$ \int^1_0 \frac{\mathrm{Li}_{q-1}(x)\mathrm{Li}_{q}(x)\mathrm{Li}_{q+1}(x)}{x}\, dx= \frac{\zeta(q+1)\zeta(q)^2}{2}-\frac{1}{2}\int^1_0 \frac{\mathrm{Li}_{q}(x)^3}{x}\, dx$$

Hence we have

$$\int^1_0\frac{\mathrm{Li}_{q}(x)^3}{x}\, dx = \zeta(q+1)\zeta(q)^2-2\int^1_0 \frac{\mathrm{Li}_{q-1}(x)\mathrm{Li}_{q}(x)\mathrm{Li}_{q+1}(x)}{x}\, dx$$

Integrating by parts again we obtain

$$\int^1_0 \frac{\mathrm{Li}_{q-1}(x)\mathrm{Li}_{q}(x)\mathrm{Li}_{q+1}(x)}{x}\, dx=\frac{\zeta(q-1)\zeta^2(q+1)}{2}-\frac{1}{2}\int^1_0 \frac{\mathrm{Li}_{q+1}(x)^2\mathrm{Li}_{q-2}(x)}{x}\, dx$$

So we have the following formula

$$\int^1_0\frac{\mathrm{Li}_{q}(x)^3-\mathrm{Li}_{q+1}(x)^2\mathrm{Li}_{q-2}(x)}{x}\, dx = \zeta(q+1)\zeta(q)^2-\zeta(q-1)\zeta^2(q+1)$$
 
  • #11
Hey , I found a paper by PEDRO FREITAS that exactly dealt with the form I had in mind namely the author discusses

$$J(m,p,q)= \int^1_0 x^m \mathrm{Li}_p(x) \mathrm{Li}_q(x) \, dx$$

The author gives a general formula for $$J(-1,p,q) =\mathscr{H}(p,q)$$ which is just like the formula I gave proof for but he uses a different method. He discusses many special cases for $$m=-2$$.

Here is a link for the paper.
 
  • #12
Thanks for the link, Zaid! (Hug)

I read that paper years ago, and have been trying to locate it again more recently. :D
 
  • #13
DreamWeaver said:
Thanks for the link, Zaid! (Hug)

I read that paper years ago, and have been trying to locate it again more recently. :D

Yup , very interesting . He treats a generalization of my results. I am glad I found it .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K