What is the limit of k over k squared?

  • Thread starter Thread starter icystrike
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form Zero
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
8 replies · 3K views
icystrike
Messages
444
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



[PLAIN]http://img190.imageshack.us/img190/3204/84956253.jpg

This is not a homework.. I am wondering if it should really be zero or indeterminant form and i need a explanation(dont hesitate to quote from theorems)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


The first two, [itex]\lim_{k\to\infty} 0= 0[/itex] and [itex]\lim_{k\to\infty} 0\cdot k= 0[/itex] are correct- they are both the limit of the sequence 0, 0, 0, ...

The third one is not "inderminant"- it does not exist because [itex]\lim_{k\to\infty} k[/itex] does not exist.
 


Do pardon me.. why [itex]\lim_{k\to\infty} k[/itex] does not exist?

(I'm suspecting the determinant form of the indeterminant is 0)
 
Last edited:


[tex]\lim_{k \to \infty} k = \infty[/tex]

The limit doesn't actually exist, since [itex]\infty[/itex] isn't a finite number. All this says is that as k gets large without bound, then (obviously) k gets large without bound. This is not one of the indeterminate forms (no such word as indeterminant) such as the following:
[tex] \left[\frac{\infty}{\infty}\right]<br /> \left[\infty - \infty\right]\\<br /> \left[\frac{0}{0}\right]\\<br /> \left[1^{\infty}\right][/tex]
 


Mark44 said:
[tex]\lim_{k \to \infty} k = \infty[/tex]

The limit doesn't actually exist, since [itex]\infty[/itex] isn't a finite number. All this says is that as k gets large without bound, then (obviously) k gets large without bound. This is not one of the indeterminate forms (no such word as indeterminant) such as the following:
[tex] \left[\frac{\infty}{\infty}\right]<br /> \left[\infty - \infty\right]\\<br /> \left[\frac{0}{0}\right]\\<br /> \left[1^{\infty}\right][/tex]

However, we can always change into
attachment.php?attachmentid=29483&stc=1&d=1288370729.jpg
which is indeed 0/0
 
Attachments
  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    1.4 KB · Views: 522


The rule

[tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow +\infty}{x_ny_n}=\lim_{n\rightarrow +\infty}{x_n}\lim_{n\rightarrow +\infty}{y_n}[/tex]

which you use, does not always hold. It only holds if the two limits on the right-hand side exists. And this is not the case here...
 


icystrike said:
However, we can always change into
attachment.php?attachmentid=29483&stc=1&d=1288370729.jpg
which is indeed 0/0
Indeed it is not. The denominator is approaching 0, but the numerator is 1.
 


There is a 0 outside the limit won't it make it 0/0?
Secondly, if limit of k as k tends to infinity does not exist, how about limit of k/k^2 as k tends to inifinity? ( since you can break up the limit to (lim k)/(lim k^2)
 


That font is so small in that thumbnail that I took it to be 0 - the rest.

In any case, I don't see the point in going to complicated expressions just to represent
[tex]\lim_{k \to \infty} k = \infty[/tex].

In one sense, which is what HallsOfIvy was saying, the limit doesn't exist, since infinity isn't a value in the real number system. To say that the limit is infinity just means that the value of k gets larger and larger as k gets larger and larger.

[tex]\lim_{k \to \infty} \frac{k}{k^2} = \lim_{k \to \infty} \frac{1}{k} = 0[/tex]

The first expression is one of the indeterminate forms I mentioned earlier in this thread. It can be simplified to the second expression above, which has a limit of 0.