What is the limit of k over k squared?

  • Thread starter Thread starter icystrike
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form Zero
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the limit of the expression k over k squared as k approaches infinity. Participants are exploring whether this limit should be considered zero or an indeterminate form, and are seeking clarification on the definitions and implications of these concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants attempt to clarify the nature of limits involving infinity and question the classification of certain forms as indeterminate. Others raise concerns about the validity of applying limit rules in this context and explore the implications of limits approaching infinity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the nature of limits and questioning assumptions about indeterminate forms. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the limit of k as k approaches infinity and how it relates to the original expression.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the definitions of indeterminate forms and the behavior of limits as variables approach infinity. There is mention of potential confusion regarding the representation of limits and the implications of infinity not being a finite number.

icystrike
Messages
444
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



[PLAIN]http://img190.imageshack.us/img190/3204/84956253.jpg

This is not a homework.. I am wondering if it should really be zero or indeterminant form and i need a explanation(dont hesitate to quote from theorems)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


The first two, [itex]\lim_{k\to\infty} 0= 0[/itex] and [itex]\lim_{k\to\infty} 0\cdot k= 0[/itex] are correct- they are both the limit of the sequence 0, 0, 0, ...

The third one is not "inderminant"- it does not exist because [itex]\lim_{k\to\infty} k[/itex] does not exist.
 


Do pardon me.. why [itex]\lim_{k\to\infty} k[/itex] does not exist?

(I'm suspecting the determinant form of the indeterminant is 0)
 
Last edited:


[tex]\lim_{k \to \infty} k = \infty[/tex]

The limit doesn't actually exist, since [itex]\infty[/itex] isn't a finite number. All this says is that as k gets large without bound, then (obviously) k gets large without bound. This is not one of the indeterminate forms (no such word as indeterminant) such as the following:
[tex] \left[\frac{\infty}{\infty}\right]<br /> \left[\infty - \infty\right]\\<br /> \left[\frac{0}{0}\right]\\<br /> \left[1^{\infty}\right][/tex]
 


Mark44 said:
[tex]\lim_{k \to \infty} k = \infty[/tex]

The limit doesn't actually exist, since [itex]\infty[/itex] isn't a finite number. All this says is that as k gets large without bound, then (obviously) k gets large without bound. This is not one of the indeterminate forms (no such word as indeterminant) such as the following:
[tex] \left[\frac{\infty}{\infty}\right]<br /> \left[\infty - \infty\right]\\<br /> \left[\frac{0}{0}\right]\\<br /> \left[1^{\infty}\right][/tex]

However, we can always change into
attachment.php?attachmentid=29483&stc=1&d=1288370729.jpg
which is indeed 0/0
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    1.4 KB · Views: 502


The rule

[tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow +\infty}{x_ny_n}=\lim_{n\rightarrow +\infty}{x_n}\lim_{n\rightarrow +\infty}{y_n}[/tex]

which you use, does not always hold. It only holds if the two limits on the right-hand side exists. And this is not the case here...
 


icystrike said:
However, we can always change into
attachment.php?attachmentid=29483&stc=1&d=1288370729.jpg
which is indeed 0/0
Indeed it is not. The denominator is approaching 0, but the numerator is 1.
 


There is a 0 outside the limit won't it make it 0/0?
Secondly, if limit of k as k tends to infinity does not exist, how about limit of k/k^2 as k tends to inifinity? ( since you can break up the limit to (lim k)/(lim k^2)
 


That font is so small in that thumbnail that I took it to be 0 - the rest.

In any case, I don't see the point in going to complicated expressions just to represent
[tex]\lim_{k \to \infty} k = \infty[/tex].

In one sense, which is what HallsOfIvy was saying, the limit doesn't exist, since infinity isn't a value in the real number system. To say that the limit is infinity just means that the value of k gets larger and larger as k gets larger and larger.

[tex]\lim_{k \to \infty} \frac{k}{k^2} = \lim_{k \to \infty} \frac{1}{k} = 0[/tex]

The first expression is one of the indeterminate forms I mentioned earlier in this thread. It can be simplified to the second expression above, which has a limit of 0.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
16K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K