What is the Linear Variation Method in Molecular Quantum Mechanics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Linear Variation Method as presented in chapter 9-5 of "Basic Principles and Techniques of Molecular Quantum Mechanics" by Ralph Christoffersen. The method involves minimizing the energy expression E = c†Hc/c†Sc by setting the derivative with respect to the coefficient cp* to zero. A participant questions the validity of Christoffersen's approach, suggesting an alternative interpretation using the quotient rule for derivatives. The confusion arises from the postponement of the derivative setting process in the text.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the Linear Variation Method
  • Knowledge of derivative calculus
  • Experience with energy minimization techniques in quantum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Linear Variation Method in detail
  • Review derivative calculus and the quotient rule
  • Examine energy minimization techniques in quantum mechanics
  • Read further chapters of "Basic Principles and Techniques of Molecular Quantum Mechanics" for context
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on molecular quantum mechanics and energy minimization techniques.

Morten
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
In the chapter 9-5 "The Linear Variation Method" p. 363 from the book: Basic Principles and Techniques of Molecular Quantum Mechanics by Ralph Christoffersen, the first thing he does is to minimize the energy, E = cHc/cSc, by requiring its derivative with respect to the coefficient cp* to equal zero. He claims the following expression:
dE/dcp* (cSc) + E d/dcp* (cSc) = d/dcp* (cHc) , whereas, by the quotient rule, I would claim:
((dE/dcp*)(cHc)(cSc) - (cHc) dE/dcp*(cSc)) / (cSc)2 = 0 , am I perhaps wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The thing was, Ralph indicated strongly the action of setting the derivate equal to zero in that expression but this was postponed to later on in the book as I just read, that was what confused me. For this I am sorry
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 88 ·
3
Replies
88
Views
14K