I have a very fundamental question about the linear variational method (Huckel theory).(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

It says in any textbook that the variational method provides energy upper bound to the actual energy of a wavefunction by using test wavefunction.

[tex]\varepsilon = \frac{\sum_{i,j}^{n}C_{i}C_{j}H_{ij} }{\sum_{i,j}^{n}C_{i}C_{j}S_{ij}}[/tex]

This means that the derivative ofεby C_{i}is 0, which would provide the minimum.

However, the right side of the equation above is a quadratic/quadratic rational function. If I understand correctly, depending on the numerator and denominator, it can also have a maximum (or might not even have any). So [itex]\frac{d\varepsilon }{dC_{i}} = 0[/itex] does not necessarily provide the minimum.

I am guessing that I am referring to a general case in mathematics, rather than special case with several constraints like in quantum mechanics. So then how do we know in this "special case" that [itex]\frac{d\varepsilon }{dC_{i}} = 0[/itex] will always give the minimum?

This might be a very stupid noob question, but it was something I took for granted and never really thought about.

EDIT: In fact, actual calculation does indeed reach to an adequately right result. This is why I took it for granted. But, I wish to know why obtaining the minimum is a necessary condition.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I Derivative = 0 is always minima? (Linear variational method)

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**