MHB What is the meaning of one-to-one correspondence between subsets of S?

  • Thread starter Thread starter yakin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subsets
yakin
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
What is the meaning of one-to-one correspondence between subsets of S?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So, a function you can think of as a subset of points in the $xy$ plane that satisfy a vertical line test: no vertical line you draw can touch the function in more than one place. If, in addition, the function passes a horizontal line test (no horizontal line you could draw touches the function in more than one place), then we say the function is one-to-one. When you say "one-to-one correspondence", you typically mean a one-to-one function.

More formally: a one-to-one function is a function that maps unique points in the domain to unique points in the range. (And of course, if it's a function, then unique points in the range had to come from unique points in the domain.)
 
Ackbach said:
When you say "one-to-one correspondence", you typically mean a one-to-one function.
Wikipedia says that one-to-one correspondence is a bijective function, i.e., a function that is both one-to-one and onto. I've seen this interpretation before as well. And yes, it is confusing.
 
Evgeny.Makarov said:
Wikipedia says that one-to-one correspondence is a bijective function, i.e., a function that is both one-to-one and onto. I've seen this interpretation before as well. And yes, it is confusing.

Sure, although in this context, it likely means a function between two infinite sets that allows you to conclude that they have the same cardinality. Is "onto" a necessary property to show this?
 
Of course: the fact that two sets have the same cardinality is evidenced by a bijection, and by definition it is both one-to-one and onto.

In any case, this is the terminology that I've seen so far.
  • One-to-one function: a function that maps different inputs to different outputs.
  • One-to-one correspondence: a function that is one-to-one and onto, i.e., covers the whole codomain.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top