What is the meaning of one-to-one correspondence between subsets of S?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter yakin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subsets
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of one-to-one correspondence between subsets of a set S, particularly focusing on its implications in the context of functions and cardinality. Participants explore definitions, interpretations, and the relationship between one-to-one functions and bijective functions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants describe a function as a subset of points in the $xy$ plane that satisfies the vertical line test, leading to the definition of one-to-one functions.
  • Others clarify that "one-to-one correspondence" typically refers to a bijective function, which is both one-to-one and onto, as noted in sources like Wikipedia.
  • A participant questions whether "onto" is a necessary property to demonstrate that two sets have the same cardinality, suggesting that this aspect may be context-dependent.
  • Another participant asserts that a bijection is required to show that two sets have the same cardinality, reiterating the definitions of one-to-one functions and one-to-one correspondence.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express some agreement on the definitions of one-to-one functions and one-to-one correspondence, but there is disagreement regarding the necessity of the "onto" property in establishing cardinality equivalence.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights potential ambiguities in terminology and the dependence on context when interpreting the properties of functions related to one-to-one correspondence.

yakin
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
What is the meaning of one-to-one correspondence between subsets of S?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So, a function you can think of as a subset of points in the $xy$ plane that satisfy a vertical line test: no vertical line you draw can touch the function in more than one place. If, in addition, the function passes a horizontal line test (no horizontal line you could draw touches the function in more than one place), then we say the function is one-to-one. When you say "one-to-one correspondence", you typically mean a one-to-one function.

More formally: a one-to-one function is a function that maps unique points in the domain to unique points in the range. (And of course, if it's a function, then unique points in the range had to come from unique points in the domain.)
 
Ackbach said:
When you say "one-to-one correspondence", you typically mean a one-to-one function.
Wikipedia says that one-to-one correspondence is a bijective function, i.e., a function that is both one-to-one and onto. I've seen this interpretation before as well. And yes, it is confusing.
 
Evgeny.Makarov said:
Wikipedia says that one-to-one correspondence is a bijective function, i.e., a function that is both one-to-one and onto. I've seen this interpretation before as well. And yes, it is confusing.

Sure, although in this context, it likely means a function between two infinite sets that allows you to conclude that they have the same cardinality. Is "onto" a necessary property to show this?
 
Of course: the fact that two sets have the same cardinality is evidenced by a bijection, and by definition it is both one-to-one and onto.

In any case, this is the terminology that I've seen so far.
  • One-to-one function: a function that maps different inputs to different outputs.
  • One-to-one correspondence: a function that is one-to-one and onto, i.e., covers the whole codomain.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K