Sets, Subsets, Possible Relations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the mathematical concepts of sets, subsets, and their relations. It establishes that for a set with n elements, the number of subsets is calculated as 2^n, while the number of possible relations between those subsets is (2^n)^2, equating to 2^(2n). The "true" possible relations are determined to be 3^n, as demonstrated through examples with sets {1}, {1,2}, and {1,2,3}. The conclusion suggests that the pattern holds without the need for formal induction, relying instead on the binomial expansion of (2+1)^n.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of set theory and basic mathematical notation
  • Familiarity with the concepts of subsets and relations
  • Knowledge of binomial expansion
  • Basic principles of mathematical induction
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore advanced set theory concepts, including cardinality and infinite sets
  • Study mathematical induction techniques in depth
  • Learn about combinatorial mathematics and its applications
  • Investigate the implications of relations in set theory, such as equivalence and order relations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, computer scientists, and students studying discrete mathematics or set theory, particularly those interested in combinatorial analysis and relations between sets.

Figaro
Messages
103
Reaction score
7
Given a set, there are subsets and possible relations between those arbitrary subsets. For a given example set, the possible relation between the subsets of the example set will narrow down to the "true" possible relations between those subsets.

a) {1}
Number of Subsets: ##2^1 = 2## (∅, {1}) where the power means how many elements

Number of Possible Relations (suppose those two subsets A and B are arbitrary): ##2^2 = 4## (A⊆A, A⊆B, B⊆B, B⊆A) where the base is 2 since there are two subsets and the power is 2 since there are two possible ways to relate each pair.

Number of "True" Possible Relations: 3 (∅⊆∅, ∅⊆{1}, {1}⊆{1})

b) {1,2}
Number of Subsets: ##2^2 = 4##

Number of Possible Relations (suppose those two subsets A and B are arbitrary): ##4^2 = 16##

Number of "True" Possible Relations: 9

c) {1,2,3}
Number of Subsets: ##2^3 = 8##

Number of Possible Relations (suppose those two subsets A and B are arbitrary): ##8^2 = 64##

Number of "True" Possible Relations: 27

d) {1,2,3, ..., n}
Number of Subsets: ##2^n##

Number of Possible Relations (suppose those two subsets A and B are arbitrary): ##(2^n)^2 = 2^{2n}##

Number of "True" Possible Relations: ##3^n##

Part d) is guesswork. So is part d) correct by the pattern that is given in part a)-c)? I know that I need to do induction in order to formally say that IT is correct but the question is if I can guess by the pattern.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a set with n elements, you have
- 1 subset with 0 elements, leading to 2n true possible relations
- n subsets with 1 element, leading to n*2n-1 true possible relations
- ...
- 1 subset with n elements, leading to 1 possible relation.

This is the binomial expansion of (2+1)n. No need to use induction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K