I What is the missing number in this number sequence pattern?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter kardo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around identifying the missing number (X) in a number sequence pattern presented in an employee assessment. Participants explore mathematical operations such as addition, subtraction, division, and multiplication to find the solution. A proposed solution shows that the pattern holds for the first three rows, leading to the equation 1 + 3 = 5 + X. The conversation emphasizes the importance of not sharing answers that could impact real-life decisions or assessments. Overall, the focus remains on solving the number sequence logically while adhering to ethical guidelines.
kardo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
pattern numbers
these are a pattern of number sequence asked in assessment for new employee , what could be the missed number
9 1 6 4
4 5 7 2
5 8 8 5
1 3 5 X

is says the equation could be limited to (addition, subtraction, division and multiplying)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
9-6=4-1
4-7=2-5
5-8=5-8
1-5=X-3
X=-1
 
Last edited:
kardo said:
TL;DR Summary: pattern numbers

these are a pattern of number sequence asked in assessment for new employee , what could be the missed number
9 1 6 4
4 5 7 2
5 8 8 5
1 3 5 X

is says the equation could be limited to (addition, subtraction, division and multiplying)
Is the solution unique?

Here is one

9 + 1 = 6 + 4
4 + 5 = 7 + 2
5 + 8 = 8 + 5
1 + 3 = 5 + X
 
Please refrain from posting questions and answers (!) that could affect decisions in real life.

We don't do it in case of car accidents, so we shouldn't do it in the realm of assessments. Furthermore, we do not solve homework questions, of any kind.

Thank you.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top