What is the most accurate method for measuring 6 mL of water?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the most accurate method for measuring 6 mL of water using different volumetric devices: graduated cylinder, pipet, and buret. Participants explore aspects of accuracy, convenience, and the characteristics of each measuring tool.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the pipet is the most accurate method due to its ability to control the flow of water, while the graduated cylinder is considered the least convenient due to difficulties in dispensing excess water.
  • Another participant questions the relevance of terms like "to contain" and "to deliver," and raises inquiries about the graduation increments of the graduated cylinder, pipet, and buret.
  • A participant mentions that the graduated cylinder has a graduation of 1.0 mL with an error of +/- 0.5 mL, while both the buret and pipet are graduated in 0.1 mL with an error of +/- 0.05 mL.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the accuracy of the error margins provided, suggesting that it may depend on the specific glass used.
  • Another participant notes that the classification of volumetric glassware (Class A vs. Class B) and temperature may also affect accuracy.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on which method is the most accurate and convenient, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without a consensus on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the accuracy of the error margins and the specific characteristics of the glassware used, which may influence the discussion.

iconwin
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Can anyone please tell me which one of the following is the most accurate method of Volume measurement for 6 mL of water (density= 1g/mL): Graduated Cylinder, Pipet, or Buret. Also, how can you explain your answer. Every help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you ever measured volume using these methods? Or have you at least seen them used? Neglecting accuracy for a moment - which will be the most convenient? Why? Which will be the least convenient? Why?

And I am not asking about some theoretical stuff, but about your gut feelings.
 
Borek said:
Have you ever measured volume using these methods? Or have you at least seen them used? Neglecting accuracy for a moment - which will be the most convenient? Why? Which will be the least convenient? Why?

And I am not asking about some theoretical stuff, but about your gut feelings.


First, thank you for replying my question. Secondly, I think the pipet will be the most convenient method because we can control the flowing of water easily with the wheel. The cylinder will be the least convenient because it hard to dispense the extra water if we overpour water in it. So , I think the Pipet should be the most accurate measuring method because it yield the least percent of error.

If I were wrong, please tell me. Thanks again!
 
Last edited:
Are you familiar with the terms "to contain" and "to deliver"? (and why would that be relevant?) Is the graduated cylinder graduated in 0.1 mL increments? Is the pipette even graduated at all? Is the pipette calibrated to contain a particular volume? (ie. is it a volumetric pipette?) Are the buret's graduations in 0.1 mL increments?
 
chemisttree said:
Are you familiar with the terms "to contain" and "to deliver"? (and why would that be relevant?) Is the graduated cylinder graduated in 0.1 mL increments? Is the pipette even graduated at all? Is the pipette calibrated to contain a particular volume? (ie. is it a volumetric pipette?) Are the buret's graduations in 0.1 mL increments?

Hi,
I think I can distinguish between the terms "to contain" and "to deliver" :) The graduated cylinder graduated in 1.0 mL increments (error: +/- 0.5mL), and both buret and pipette are graduated in 0.1 mL (error: +/- 0.05mL).
 
At this moment you may safely assume that one of these devices is less acurate. Honestly, I am not sure if anything more can be done (that's assuming that you are right about +/- 0.05 mL error, that's not necesarilly true; it may depend on particular glass).
 
It will also depend on the classification of the volumetric glassware and the temperature etc

Class A glassware is produced to tighter (volumetric) controls than class B glassware. these
 
Thanks to all!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
705
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
783
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
19K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
12K
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K