Experimental Error in Archimedes Principle Lab

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on identifying scientific reasons for a 0.5% error in a lab experiment utilizing Archimedes' Principle to measure the density of iron. The user employed a graduated cylinder and two different scales for mass measurement. Potential sources of error identified include impurities in the iron mass and limitations in the precision of the measuring equipment, which only measures within a 1% margin of error. The user seeks thoughtful, scientific explanations rather than human error factors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Archimedes' Principle
  • Familiarity with density measurement techniques
  • Knowledge of graduated cylinders and their use in experiments
  • Basic principles of measurement error and precision
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of impurities on density measurements
  • Learn about precision limits of laboratory scales
  • Investigate common sources of experimental error in density measurements
  • Explore methods for improving measurement accuracy in laboratory settings
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, laboratory technicians, and educators involved in experimental design and analysis, particularly those focusing on density measurements and error analysis in scientific experiments.

GiantSheeps
Messages
83
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


I need to find three potential reasons for my .5% error in a lab where I used the Archimedes Principle to measure the density of Iron. We only used a graduated cylinder full of water and an iron mass. I measured the water level from the meniscus. We used two different machines to measure the mass of the iron.

Human error does not count, reasons must be "scientific and thoughtful".

2. No formulas on this one, I've already calculated the percent error

The Attempt at a Solution


So I'm having a lot trouble with this one! So far all I have is a potential reason is impurities in the iron ore used to make the masses.

I figure since it's such a small amount of error that reasons will be little things like that. Any hints/help would be greatly appreciated! I really am stuck

Thank you so much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
https://www.dartmouth.edu/~chemlab/techniques/flasks.html
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: GiantSheeps
Bystander said:
https://www.dartmouth.edu/~chemlab/techniques/flasks.html
Ah thank you very much! They only measure within 1%, so the .5% error makes perfect sense! Thank you, thank you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
778
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K