What is the most challenging subject in math?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fourier jr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematical
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The most challenging subject in mathematics, as discussed, is Algebra, particularly the theory of groups. Participants express that Algebra's abstract nature makes it difficult to grasp intuitively, unlike other areas such as Hilbert spaces or projective geometry, which offer more tangible concepts. The teaching style, characterized by a focus on definitions and theorems without a cohesive narrative, contributes to the perception of difficulty. This discussion highlights the subjective nature of mathematical challenges, emphasizing individual experiences and preferences.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Algebraic structures, specifically group theory.
  • Familiarity with Hilbert spaces and projective geometry concepts.
  • Knowledge of mathematical proofs and logical derivation.
  • Ability to analyze teaching methodologies in mathematics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore advanced topics in group theory and its applications.
  • Study Hilbert spaces in-depth to compare with Algebraic concepts.
  • Research effective teaching strategies for abstract mathematics.
  • Investigate intuitive learning methods in mathematics education.
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and mathematicians seeking to understand the challenges of abstract mathematics, particularly in Algebra and its teaching methodologies.

fourier jr
Messages
764
Reaction score
13
Everyone seems to have their preferences, so I wonder what people prefer the least, or what they find to be the most difficult subject in math, sunject you could never get your head around etc etc? (I know it's different for everybody, that's why I'm asking)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I personally find nothing as hard as Algebra (referring to the theory of groups and such), because it's simply so abstract you cannot even form the faintest intuitive idea, something you can do with Hilbert spaces, projective geometry, etc ...
It might also be the style in which I've received it: a heap of definitions and then theorems logically derived from these definitions with proofs that are logically correct but have no intuitive thought process behind them (or at least don't seem to...) with no story line to tie the different definitions and theorems together.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K