What Is the Nature of Time and Its Existence?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Parmaanu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    India Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of time, its creation, and its existence, exploring philosophical and theoretical questions related to time's beginning, its measurement, and its relationship with the universe. Participants express their thoughts on whether time is fundamental or emerges from other phenomena, and whether it existed before the universe or the Big Bang.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the nature of time and how it is created, suggesting that even without physical movement, time continues to pass.
  • Another participant proposes that time may be a measure of change, potentially emerging from quantum mechanics rather than being a fundamental property.
  • There is a suggestion that time could be analogous to gravity, with a metaphor describing it as a river that flows in one direction, implying a possible malleability of time.
  • A participant mentions the idea that true time travel to the past may not be possible, although they refrain from labeling it as impossible.
  • One participant recommends a book by Stephen Hawking, indicating it may provide insights into the nature of time.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints regarding the nature and existence of time, with no consensus reached on the fundamental questions posed. Multiple competing views remain, particularly concerning whether time is fundamental or emergent, and whether it existed prior to the universe.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes speculative ideas about time's properties and its relationship with physical phenomena, but lacks definitive conclusions or resolutions to the questions raised.

Parmaanu
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Am a new joinee (from India). I have been thinking about time for sometime now (:smile:). So here are my questions ... and no, I don't have any background in Physics (apart from senior school level i.e.).

What is nature of time?

How is time created?

When we move to the next measuring unit of time (say a second or a minute) of the very immediate future , how does it come into existence? Initially one might think that this is due to Earth's rotation around Sun & its axis .. but then if you think a bit deeper into this, even if the movement doesn't happen ... time is still going to pass .. and since time is passing, it means it is getting created .. and that is the question that I have ... how is time created?

Does time has a beginning and an end?

Was time there before the universe was created ? Or the 00:00 of time started at the time when universe was created?

Did 'time' exist before the big-bang?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Parmaanu said:
Am a new joinee (from India). I have been thinking about time for sometime now (:smile:). So here are my questions ... and no, I don't have any background in Physics (apart from senior school level i.e.).

What is nature of time?

How is time created?

When we move to the next measuring unit of time (say a second or a minute) of the very immediate future , how does it come into existence? Initially one might think that this is due to Earth's rotation around Sun & its axis .. but then if you think a bit deeper into this, even if the movement doesn't happen ... time is still going to pass .. and since time is passing, it means it is getting created .. and that is the question that I have ... how is time created?

Does time has a beginning and an end?

Was time there before the universe was created ? Or the 00:00 of time started at the time when universe was created?

Did 'time' exist before the big-bang?


Time is a measure of change. We see things proceed from one state to another and compare this change of state to other, more standard, changes of state, for example, how many waves of light are emitted from excited atom, etc.

The question is whether time as we experience it is fundamental or does it emerge from more basic effects. Could it be that time is a classical property that emerges from quantum mechanics?

In quantum mechanics, electrons (and everything else) take every possible path. And what we observe is an integrated sum of all possibilities. All possible paths exist simultaneously in superposition, and what we observe is the accumulated effect. That means we include paths that go backwards in time, and even paths that travel faster than the speed of light. We use what is called the Feynman Path Integral to account for every possibility. And what this formulation does in effect is add up every possible change from every state to every other state. Each "path" is marked off with some parameter (we call it time) as it moves from one state to the next. Thus, I think at the most basic level (the quantum mechanical level) time is just a mean of keeping track of changes in state, both forward and backward in observable time. But the linear progression we observe is the classical effect that emerges from this quantum mechanical formulation.
 
Last edited:
Parmaanu said:
Am a new joinee (from India). I have been thinking about time for sometime now (:smile:). So here are my questions ... and no, I don't have any background in Physics (apart from senior school level i.e.).

What is nature of time?

How is time created?

When we move to the next measuring unit of time (say a second or a minute) of the very immediate future , how does it come into existence? Initially one might think that this is due to Earth's rotation around Sun & its axis .. but then if you think a bit deeper into this, even if the movement doesn't happen ... time is still going to pass .. and since time is passing, it means it is getting created .. and that is the question that I have ... how is time created?

Does time has a beginning and an end?

Was time there before the universe was created ? Or the 00:00 of time started at the time when universe was created?

Did 'time' exist before the big-bang?


I think you should check out the book by Stephen Hawking, A Brief History of Time.
 
To put it in another digestible form, I see it kind of like gravity, although I guess it's nothing like gravity other than the analog I use. Imagine being a solitary person in space and nothing around for millions of miles but you and one planet. You keep heading that direction and to you, that's the only direction there is. There is no way to go away from it and all elementary particles are flowing in that direction too. It's like a river for which we don't have the power to row against because there's nothing we know of to grab on to to propel ourselves in the other direction. Perhaps time may be like a space and everything else around us is headed in the same direction and we just can't out-power it. Maybe, at a later point, it could reverse direction, but may not be an exact replication of what once was, like a river reversing direction or particles forming a planet and billions of years later, due to natural reasons, it's back to particles again. I see it as sort of a malleable material. It may seem uni-direcitonal and im-movable to us with our little physical and intellectual power but on a broader scale, it may just be malleable on another scale.

But malleable in a sense that we could take some clay and mold a shape but no matter how perfect the mold, it will never be a true particle by particle representation of the original. So in that sense, I don't see true time travel to the past by us as possible, even though I hate using the word impossible. But that's another subject which I won't go into.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K