What is the Period of a Near Rectilinear Orbit with Zero Minor Axis?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LCSphysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Comet Period
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the period of a near rectilinear orbit, particularly focusing on the implications of having a zero minor axis. Participants are examining the nature of the orbit and its classification, as well as the mathematical relationships involved.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are exploring the definitions of different types of orbits, particularly distinguishing between parabolic and elliptical orbits. There is a focus on understanding the implications of a zero minor axis and how it affects the motion described.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the nature of the orbit, suggesting that it is a degenerate elliptical orbit. There is an ongoing exploration of the parameters involved in the problem and how they relate to the equations presented in the textbook. Questions remain regarding discrepancies between personal calculations and textbook answers.

Contextual Notes

Participants are encouraged to clarify the parameters given in the problem statement and the specific equations referenced, as these details may influence the understanding of the orbit's characteristics and the calculations involved.

LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
163
Homework Statement
I don't know how to calc the period of a parable orbit.
Relevant Equations
third kepler's law: T = 2pia^3/2*(m/k)^0.5
1589866659957.png

I made and understood the letters a b c, but i don't understand the letter d.
I thought it would be the double of the answer C [
1589867959155.png
], but seems that's not right, since the book says the answer is two times the answer of B [ two times this[
1589867982243.png
]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The case described is not a parabolic orbit. The comet will return to it's starting position and velocity, and the comet's path repeats itself and is periodic. It is actually an extremely elongated ellipse. A parabolic orbit does not repeat.
 
phyzguy said:
The case described is not a parabolic orbit. The comet will return to it's starting position and velocity, and the comet's path repeats itself and is periodic. It is actually an extremely elongated ellipse. A parabolic orbit does not repeat.
It has been confused to me, since that area's law say basically dA/dt = L/2m, and being L = 0, what type of motion is this? I can't see.
 
LCSphysicist said:
It has been confused to me, since that area's law say basically dA/dt = L/2m, and being L = 0, what type of motion is this? I can't see.
The area of the orbit is zero. The comet justs moves back and forth along a line, kind of like a weight on a spring. Think of an elliptical orbit where the width of the orbit (the small direction) gets compressed to zero.
 
phyzguy said:
The area of the orbit is zero. The comet justs moves back and forth along a line, kind of like a weight on a spring. Think of an elliptical orbit where the width of the orbit (the small direction) gets compressed to zero.
OMG now i see, it really makes sense,but, unfortunately, i don't get yet the book's answer
We could apply the third kepler's law with great accuracy:

T = 2pi*(r/2)^3/2*(1/G*Ms)^0.5

T = pi*(r^3/(2*G*Ms))^0.5
1589901037882.png


DO you see any mistake?
 

Attachments

  • 1589901033164.png
    1589901033164.png
    959 bytes · Views: 173
Its a degenerate elliptical orbit that some authors label as rectilinear orbits.
 
Filip Larsen said:
Its a degenerate elliptical orbit that some authors label as rectilinear orbits.
Yes:)) Now i see.
DO you agree with my result?
 
I assume you are still trying to understand why the answers in your textbook disagrees with your own result and, if so, we will probably better be able to spot where you go astray if you can specify what parameters are given in Problem 8.20 and what equation (4.58) is all about.

As already mention in this thread, the (near) rectilinear orbit is really "just" an elliptical orbit where the minor axis is (near) zero, or similarly, where the apoapsis (r_max) is finite (as for an elliptical orbit) and periapsis (r_min) is zero. By "just" I mean that the most of the equations for an elliptical orbit, e.g. equations speed or period, can be used directly by applying the right value for semi-major axis (which luckily relates fairly simple to the apo- and periapsis distance).

(Edit for wording).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K