Undergrad What is the physical interpretation of eigenstates in quantum mechanics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the physical interpretation of eigenstates in quantum mechanics, specifically in relation to operators such as ##\hat{A}##, ##\hat{x}##, ##\hat{p}##, and ##\hat{H}##. An eigenstate ##x## satisfies the equation ##\hat{A} x=\lambda x##, indicating that the operator represents a "dilation" of the eigenstate. When an observable is measured, the state transforms into an eigenstate, allowing for repeatable measurements. The conversation highlights the complexities of infinite-dimensional state spaces and the significance of eigenvalues as measurement outcomes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics fundamentals, including operators and eigenstates.
  • Familiarity with mathematical concepts such as eigenvalues and eigenvectors.
  • Knowledge of measurement theory in quantum mechanics.
  • Basic grasp of Hamiltonian operators and their role in quantum systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the physical interpretation of quantum operators, particularly ##\hat{x}##, ##\hat{p}##, and ##\hat{H}##.
  • Study the implications of repeatable measurements in quantum mechanics.
  • Investigate the concept of infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces in quantum theory.
  • Learn about the role of eigenvalues in quantum measurement outcomes and their physical significance.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying quantum mechanics, as well as researchers interested in the foundational aspects of quantum theory and measurement. This discussion is beneficial for anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of eigenstates and their implications in quantum systems.

Gianmarco
Messages
42
Reaction score
3
Hey everyone, I've been doing some quantum mechanics but I think I have yet to fully grasp the meaning of eigenstate. What I mean is, I understand that an eigenstate ##x## is such that, if we have an operator ##\hat{A}##, it satisfies ##\hat{A} x=\lambda x## and so ##\hat{A}## represents a "dilation" of the eigenstate in the mathematical sense. Is there a way to have a physical interpretation of this though? I'm thinking about the operators ##\hat{x}, \hat{p}## and ##\hat{H}##.
I've also read that when we measure an observable on a state, the process "transforms" the state into an eigenstate and if we measure it again we will obtain the same answer. What does it mean in practice?
Thanks to anyone who will bother reading this :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You may get a better answer, but this information is available in any introductory QM text and freely available online in many reliable sources.

Someone on here may take the time to explain it all, but it will only be information that is already available to you.

Better to ask specific questions here that may help clarify the material you are learning from.
 
PeroK said:
You may get a better answer, but this information is available in any introductory QM text and freely available online in many reliable sources.

Someone on here may take the time to explain it all, but it will only be information that is already available to you.

Better to ask specific questions here that may help clarify the material you are learning from.
Hi PeroK, I understand what you are saying but the books that I'm using for this class are very formal about the whole thing. I understand the mathematics but what I'm looking for is a physical interpretation of it.
 
Gianmarco said:
Hi PeroK, I understand what you are saying but the books that I'm using for this class are very formal about the whole thing. I understand the mathematics but what I'm looking for is a physical interpretation of it.

Can you make any sense of this?

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/Scheq.html#c5
 
Gianmarco said:
Hey everyone, I've been doing some quantum mechanics but I think I have yet to fully grasp the meaning of eigenstate. What I mean is, I understand that an eigenstate ##x## is such that, if we have an operator ##\hat{A}##, it satisfies ##\hat{A} x=\lambda x## and so ##\hat{A}## represents a "dilation" of the eigenstate in the mathematical sense. Is there a way to have a physical interpretation of this though? I'm thinking about the operators ##\hat{x}, \hat{p}## and ##\hat{H}##.
I've also read that when we measure an observable on a state, the process "transforms" the state into an eigenstate and if we measure it again we will obtain the same answer. What does it mean in practice?
Thanks to anyone who will bother reading this :)

If the eigenvalue ##\lambda## is 1, the operation doesn't change the norm. If the operator doesn't represent a physical measurable quantity, the eigenvalue can even be a complex number. Quantum mechanics contains a lot of complications that are related to the infinite-dimensionality of the state spaces. Think about a three-state system that has a Hamiltonian operator ##H## and eigenstates ##|1>##, ##|2>## and ##|3>##, which correspond to eigenvalues E=1,E=2 and E=3. Now if you have an arbitrary state ##|\psi >=a|1> + b|2> + c|3>## and you operate on it ##N## times with the Hamiltonian (##N## is some very large number), the resultant state vector ##a|1> + 2^{N}b|2> + 3^{N}c|3>## is approximately a multiple of ##|3>## (if the number ##N## was large enough). In the case where there are infinitely many eigenstates of ##H##, you can't just do that when you want to find the eigenstate with largest eigenvalue.
 
Gianmarco said:
I understand that an eigenstate ##x## is such that, if we have an operator ##\hat{A}##, it satisfies ##\hat{A} x=\lambda x## and so ##\hat{A}## represents a "dilation" of the eigenstate in the mathematical sense. Is there a way to have a physical interpretation of this though? I'm thinking about the operators ##\hat{x}, \hat{p}## and ##\hat{H}##.

I don't think there is any physical meaning to the dilation. The eigenvalues are just labels of the measurement outcomes. Note that I can shift the zero eigenvalue to any eigenstate I want, but the zero vector doesn't correspond to a state vector.

Gianmarco said:
I've also read that when we measure an observable on a state, the process "transforms" the state into an eigenstate and if we measure it again we will obtain the same answer. What does it mean in practice?

You should think of this condition as a characterization of repeatable measurements rather than of a general measurement. A standard counterexample is a photon counting which absorbs and destroys the photon(s).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K