What is the point of geometric quantization?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relevance of geometric quantization in quantum-classical hybrid systems, specifically its application in prequantization and polarization in ℝ³. Participants express skepticism about the practical utility of geometric quantization beyond its mathematical framework, questioning whether it yields testable results that traditional quantum mechanics cannot achieve. Key insights include its importance for understanding quantization, integrable quantum systems, and constructing irreducible unitary representations of groups, particularly in relation to the Galilei Group.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of geometric quantization principles, including prequantization and polarization.
  • Familiarity with symplectic geometry and its applications in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of unitary representations of groups, particularly the Galilei Group.
  • Basic concepts of quantum mechanics and its mathematical formalism.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the standard reference "Geometric Quantization" by Woodhouse for foundational knowledge.
  • Explore the application of geometric quantization in integrable quantum systems.
  • Research the implications of geometric quantization on unitary representations of groups.
  • Investigate the relationship between geometric quantization and classical mechanics, focusing on constrained systems.
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in quantum mechanics, mathematicians specializing in symplectic geometry, and physicists interested in quantum-classical hybrid systems will benefit from this discussion.

andresB
Messages
625
Reaction score
374
I studied the basics of geometric quantization for a recent work in quantum-classical hybrid systems1. It was an easy application of the method of gometric quantization (prequantization + polarization in ##\mathbb{R}^{3}##).
The whole topic seems interesting since I want to learn more of symplectic geometry, but (outside the aforementioned half-quantization to get a quantum-classical theory) I fail to see the point of the whole endeavor. For example, particles constrained to move on a surface are treated with the formalism of the geometric potential of Jensen, Koppe, and Da Costa2 , and not from a quantization of the related classical situation.

What actual result from geometric quantization is important and useful outside the mathematical dicipline of geometric quantization itself?[1]https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.03623
[2]https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.00528
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Physics news on Phys.org
andresB said:
What actual result from geometric quantization is important and useful outside the mathematical dicipline of geometric quantization itself?
It is important for the understanding of quantization in general, for integrable quantum systems and for the construction of irreducible unitary representations of groups.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke and vanhees71
A. Neumaier said:
It is important for the understanding of quantization in general, for integrable quantum systems and for the construction of irreducible unitary representations of groups.

Well, the first part does not sound convincing. Does geometric quantization reproduces the quantum mechanic of a partice constrained to move on a surface embbeded in ##\mathbb{R}^{3}##?
Does it produce testable results that can't be obtained just by using the usual tools of QM?The unitary representation of groups does sound interesting. My work was about the Galilei Group in classical and "half"-quantized systems. Any good reference on group representation and geometric quantization?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
andresB said:
Does geometric quantization reproduces the quantum mechanic of a partice constrained to move on a surface
Understanding and reproducing details are very different issues.
andresB said:
Any good reference on group representation and geometric quantization?
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-662-06791-8_2
https://arxiv.org/pdf/math-ph/0208008.pdf
https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/QM/qmbook.pdf
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1801.02307.pdf
https://link-springer-com.uaccess.univie.ac.at/content/pdf/10.1007/BF02097053.pdf
https://s3.cern.ch/inspire-prod-files-6/6869199e89f197300faf2f93e55dc112
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby and andresB
Woodhouse is the standard reference on Geometric Quantization and quite well written.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 163 ·
6
Replies
163
Views
27K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
6K