What is the probability identity for multiple events?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chris L T521
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on justifying the probability identity for multiple events, which expresses the probability of the intersection of events in terms of conditional probabilities. The identity states that the probability of the intersection of events E1 through En can be calculated by multiplying the probability of E1 by the conditional probabilities of subsequent events given the previous ones. Participants CaptainBlack and Sudharaka provided correct solutions to the problem. The thread emphasizes understanding the relationship between joint and conditional probabilities. This foundational concept is crucial for advanced probability theory.
Chris L T521
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
913
Reaction score
0
Thanks to those who participated in last week's POTW! Here's this week's problem (and the last University POTW of 2012)!

-----

Problem: For events $E_1$, $E_2,\ldots,\,E_n$, justify the following probability identity: \[P(E_1\cap E_2\cap\cdots\cap E_n)=P(E_1)P(E_2\mid E_1)P(E_3\mid E_2\cap E_1)\cdots P(E_n\mid E_1\cap E_2\cap\cdots \cap E_{n-1}).\]
-----

Hint:
Use the fact that $P(A\cap B) = P(A)P(B\mid A)$.

 
Physics news on Phys.org
This week's problem was correctly answered by CaptainBlack and Sudharaka. You can find Sudharaka's solution below:

We shall show this by mathematical induction. When \(n=2\) the statement is true by the definition of conditional probability. That is,\[P(E_1\cap E_2)=P(E_1)P(E_2\mid E_1)\]
Suppose that the statement is true for \(n=p\in\mathbb{Z}^{+}\). That is,
\[P(E_1\cap E_2\cap\cdots\cap E_p)=P(E_1)P(E_2\mid E_1)P(E_3\mid E_2\cap E_1)\cdots P(E_p\mid E_1\cap E_2\cap\cdots \cap E_{p-1})~~~~~~~~~~~(1)\]
Now consider \(P(E_1\cap E_2\cap\cdots\cap E_p\cap E_{p+1})\). By the definition of conditional probability we get,
\[P(E_1\cap E_2\cap\cdots\cap E_p\cap E_{p+1}) = P(E_1\cap E_2\cap\cdots\cap E_p)P(E_{p+1}\mid E_1\cap E_2\cap\cdots \cap E_{p})~~~~~~~~~~(2)\]
By (1) and (2),
\[P(E_1\cap E_2\cap\cdots\cap E_{p+1})=P(E_1)P(E_2\mid E_1)P(E_3\mid E_2\cap E_1)\cdots P(E_{p+1}\mid E_1\cap E_2\cap\cdots \cap E_{p})\]
Therefore by mathematical induction,
\[P(E_1\cap E_2\cap\cdots\cap E_n)=P(E_1)P(E_2\mid E_1)P(E_3\mid E_2\cap E_1)\cdots P(E_n\mid E_1\cap E_2\cap\cdots \cap E_{n-1})\mbox{ for }n\in\mathbb{Z}^+\]
Q.E.D.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K