MHB What Is the Profit Percentage After Adjusting Travel Costs and Sale Gains?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bees
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Percent
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the profit percentage after factoring in travel costs and sale gains. The individual, referred to as A, spends $150 on travel and gains $150 from selling an article in Bombay, which was purchased for 15% less than its price in Bombay. Attempts to set up equations for profit and cost have led to confusion, particularly with two unknowns complicating the calculations. Ultimately, it is concluded that A's profit is effectively neutralized by the travel costs, resulting in a profit percentage of 0%. The key takeaway is that A's expenses negate any actual profit from the sale.
Bees
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Can anyone help me with this problem please?

A goes to Navik to buy an article costing 15% less than in Bombay. A spends \$150 on traveling and gains \$150 after its sale in Bombay. His profit percent is?

I did a few attempts on this problem, and I will walk you through them, but could you please share your approach to this problem? Thank you very much!

got the breakdown of pieces of information necessary to write the
>equations, but I don't seem to be able to find the equation that
>correctly correlates the expressions together. The expressions somehow
>relate to each other, but I don't know how. I wrote several formulas-
>one for profit percent, another for profit, and yet another for selling
>price-but I can't solve them. Then, I tried to relate what I know -
>profit of \$150 to the cost of \$(0.85+150) - but then did not know how
>to set up the second half of the equation on the other side of the
>equal sign. I tried that side to equal profit/0.85\$x but I am having
>one equation with 2 unknowns, where one unknown is profit and the other
>is x. And I don't know what the second equation could be!
>
>[Thoughts]
>A---------->Nasik------------>Bombay
> Cost Price
> \$x-0.15(\$x)
> 0.85(\$x)
>
>A--------->Bombay
> Cost price
> \$x
>
>Nasik-------------------->Bombay
>Cost Price Cost Price Profit Amount %Profit
>0.85(\$x) (0.85(\$x)+\$150) \$150 TBD
>
>Profit=Selling Price-Cost Price
>\$150=S.P.-0.85(\$x)+\$150
>0.85(\$x)=S.P.
>So Selling Price is 0.85(\$x). Now, I am thinking if it makes sense. It
>might because he spent \$150 on travels and his profit amount was \$150
>as well, so he neutralized his profit. The profit also depends of
>course on the cost, not only on related travel expenses, which
>represent additional cost here. So, I will know for sure what percent
>profit was when I calculate how profit relates to cost. I am having a
>hard time calculating that.
>
>Another attempt is:
>Profit % = [profit/cost price]*100%
>Profit % = [\$150/$(0.85x+150)]*100%
>Profit = [150/(0.85x+150)]*100
>So, the two unknowns here are the profit and x.
>
>I was originally thinking of using the Profit equation directly above
>with this equation directly below to give me a set of two equations
>with two unknowns. But after thinking some more, I realized that I
>cannot equal the two sides of the second equation because the % profits
>do NOT equal. This is the equation that I am talking about:
>[150/(0.85x+150)]=[profit/0.85x]
>This equation isn't right because each side of the equation expresses %
>profit and % profits in both situations do NOT equal.
>
>Another attempt:
>Selling Price=[(100% + Gain%)/100%]*Cost Price
>0.85\$X = [(100% + ?)/100%]*0.85($x)+\$150
>
>As you can see nothing is coming out. I have no idea why.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
A has paid \$150 to travel to Bombay and back and made a \$150 profit? He has made no profit at all, just got back his travel cost! His "profit percent" is 0.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
5K
Back
Top