What is the purpose of these things on this dam?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DDTJRAC
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    River Water
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the purpose of strakes on dams, specifically their role in managing water flow and preventing erosion. Strakes, which are vertical fins, create small vortices that disrupt turbulent currents, thereby reducing erosive forces on the dam's structure. They also enhance stability during high water levels and minimize cavitation bubble formation. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding these features in the context of dam engineering and water management.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hydraulic engineering principles
  • Familiarity with dam structures and their components
  • Knowledge of fluid dynamics, particularly in relation to flow control
  • Awareness of erosion and cavitation effects on concrete structures
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Hydraulic jump and its applications in dam design"
  • Explore "Energy dissipation methods in stilling basins"
  • Study "Flow control mechanisms in hydraulic engineering"
  • Investigate "The role of strakes in modern dam construction"
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, hydrologists, and environmental scientists interested in dam design, water management, and erosion control will benefit from this discussion.

DDTJRAC
Messages
10
Reaction score
18
Hello people!

What were the purpose of these things on this dam?

dam wis.jpg

LOC

Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
DDTJRAC said:
What were the purpose of these things on this dam?
I do not know, but would hazard a guess, that the ridges, (strakes?), prevent the accumulation of debris at the foot of the wall, while directing the water flow to remain perpendicular to the face.

The falling water would press objects against the flat foot of the wall, trapping them. The strakes allow water to flow under those larger objects, reducing the pressure difference, and so releasing them.

A circular rolling wave can form across the width of the dam. Without strakes, that would transport debris to collect at one end of the dam, and selectively erode a narrower channel below the dam.

There must be some interesting literature on the subject, somewhere.
Can anyone find it?

What are they really called?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron and russ_watters
I know explicit AI is not allowed, but are Google results disallowed, even though they're essentialy AI?

"Dams have strakes, which are essentially vertical fins on their surfaces, to help manage the flow of water by creating small vortices that disrupt larger turbulent currents, thus reducing the erosive forces on the dam's structure and promoting more even water distribution over its spillway; essentially acting as a flow control mechanism.

These points seem pretty plausible to me:

"Key points about strakes on dams:
Flow control:

By creating small vortices, strakes can help break up large turbulent water flows, preventing excessive erosion and damage to the dam's foundation.
Stability enhancement:
Strakes can improve the stability of the water flow over the spillway, especially during high water levels, by directing the water more evenly.
Reduced cavitation:
By manipulating the water flow, strakes can help minimize the formation of cavitation bubbles, which can cause damage to the dam's surface."
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu
The essential point of such a cascade is energy conversion. The construction cannot be seen. The question is reduced to the architecture of the stilling basin or why there are many short ones instead of a single long one.

I assume that they installed dozens of small stilling basins. This could have had practical reasons, like prefabrication. Another reason is energy reduction. The more elements are placed in the stilling basin, the more energy is lost. It also reduces the risk of underwashing: a single failure won't lead to a collapse of the entire system.

Sources:
https://izw.baw.de/publikationen/mi...teilungen_105_Pfrommer_Energiedissipation.pdf
https://www.hydro.uni-wuppertal.de/...o/downloads/Studienarbeit_Daniela_Henning.pdf
https://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/8507/1/Bachelorarbeit_AnnikaScheidler.pdf
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tosbecken
 
DaveC426913 said:
I know explicit AI is not allowed, but are Google results disallowed, evn though they're essentialy AI?
I introduced the word "strake" in post #2. I used Google search and was fed results by AI, but I found only references to boat hull "strakes" in my searches. I suspect Google AI has learned from my searches and post, and accepted the new term, being applied to dams. Can you find an original text that uses the term "strakes" that Google AI supplied as the introduction to its search results?

The OP picture, from between 1880 and 1899, is of the Fox River where it flows through Appleton, Wisconsin, USA. That weir was built during the early days of reinforced concrete, and has since been replaced. The massive concrete was pored in blocks. That left a gap between the blocks at the foot of the wall. The strakes may have been cast in place later, to cover the gaps between the blocks, to protect them from the damaging water, falling from above. I would expect blocks cast more recently to not require that protection.

Terminology: Since water flows over the crest, that is not really a dam, it is a barrage or a weir. A barrage has gates to regulate the flow, which reduces that structure to identify as a weir.

The crest height of a weir is used to regulate the level of the river above the weir. A river used for navigation will have locks to raise and lower vessels travelling along the river. The weir ensures the river is navigable, without rapids between locks. Since weirs are specific to navigable rivers, the technology will not be widely used, nor will it apply to higher dam spillways.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
Baluncore said:
I introduced the word "strake" in post #2. I used Google search and was fed results by AI, but I found only references to boat hull "strakes" in my searches. I suspect Google AI has learned from my searches and post, and accepted the new term, being applied to dams. Can you find an original text that uses the term "strakes" that Google AI supplied as the introduction to its search results?
I searched "what are strakes in dams for?" so it was pretty explicit.
 
DaveC426913 said:
I searched "what are strakes in dams for?" so it was pretty explicit.
Did you notice that there were no hits and no references?
" No results found for "what are strakes in dams for?". "
The only Google hit is this thread.

You were explicit in your challenge, so it conjured up something explicit that sounded good, by using key phrases. On analysis, Google's AI response does not really make sense. It is all platitudinal motherhood and apple pie.

The challenge is still to find, an older document that discusses strakes at the foot of weirs or dams.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: DaveC426913 and russ_watters
DaveC426913 said:
I searched "what are strakes in dams for?" so it was pretty explicit.
I searched for "Dams have strakes" (the first three words from Google's AI response you quoted) and it linked to this thread and nothing else. So Google made it up.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and Baluncore
  • #10
DrGreg said:
I searched for "Dams have strakes" (the first three words from Google's AI response you quoted) and it linked to this thread and nothing else. So Google made it up.
Or rather, Google AI regurgitated it back. You/Dave/Ba made it up.

Interesting case study on how impressionable "AI" is.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #11
I believe the correct term is 'weir' and 'chute block' or 'chute dentate block': though the last two is not a 100% fit.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and Lnewqban
  • #12
Weir is very general. There are different types of weirs with different names. I had to translate the German names and found cascade (Sohlstufen). There are still three types of cascades: stairs (Treppen), glides (Gleitung), and drops (Abstürze), for which I am not sure about their technical correctness in English. However, we are talking about the construction of the sole (Sohle), and in this case, about the building of the stilling basin (Tosbecken). These structures have two main goals: preventing underwashing (Auskolkung) and energy conversion. The falling waters have a kinetic energy that has to be converted into a uniform flow as quickly as possible, i.e. the sole drum (?) (Sohlwalze) has to be handled. Additional building elements cause additional swirls and friction, which destroys a part of the kinetic energy. They would have also allowed prefabrication, which we do not have any information about. However, it reduces the risk of underwashing. The entire construction remains intact even if a single chamber fails. An additional advantage is that these walls make any maintenance easier.

Sources: see above, post #5. No AI, but university texts and building authorities.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu
  • #14
Baluncore said:
I do not know, but would hazard a guess, that the ridges, (strakes?), prevent the accumulation of debris at the foot of the wall, while directing the water flow to remain perpendicular to the face.
Use of the term strake in this context of fluid flow makes sense and has precedent.

Consider an early improvised dam on a freshwater stream to create a pond in order to power water wheels and simple hoists. Medieval northern European (Nordic) settlers might invert boat hulls secured by stones to dam a stream and induce laminar flow downstream to power a wooden water wheel.

I have seen illustrations of woodcuts from a Cistercian monastery from 8th Century Ireland depicting similar weirs in old manuscripts, exactly the type of sources that are, at best, poorly digitized thus likely unavailable to Google online.

Certainly the term strake appears in contemporary aerodynamic literature such as this NASA wind tunnel test of various strakes on F-16 fighter jets from 1984. The term was also occasionally used for various guide ridges mounted on the walls of recirculating wind tunnels to reduce fluid (air) turbulence and induce laminar flow anterior to the test chamber.

Note the word strake has considerably more usage in British English than American, perhaps due to British English predating American by many centuries. Toggle between American and British on the dictionary.com page to illustrate this.
 
Last edited:
  • #15
Interesting how pernicious AI is. A further cautionary tale.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Baluncore and Klystron
  • #16
Rive said:
I believe the correct term is 'weir' and 'chute block' or 'chute dentate block': though the last two is not a 100% fit.
A dentate block is used to destroy the laminar flow in water where it is flowing as a thick sheet. In the OP picture, the strakes lie flat at the foot of the vertical weir. They have no obstructive tooth projection, as they are followed immediately by the flat toe of the wall.

Strakes are not present at the foot of modern dams or weirs. Indeed, dentate blocks are designed to break the linear flow during the fall, not to preserve it as the strakes do at the foot of the wall. The strakes are directing water flow away from the wall, while reducing flow along the front of the weir.

In the picture, the strakes are spaced apart by the same separation as the concrete modules that were cast in place. That suggests to me that the strakes cover and protect the joints between blocks, from the dynamic pressure of the falling water.

I see no way that strakes might be an advantage when ice forms in winter, or breaks up in spring.
 
  • #17
I am curious to know about these things, but once I went to visit a dam. The local guide told us they are called "bheta" in local language which translates as to enforce the boats when they water level is down!
 
  • #18
boats??
 
  • #20
Welcome to PF, @alexwriter

alexwriter said:
"bheta" in local language which translates as to enforce the boats when they water level is down!
What was that local language? I'm not having any luck with that translation using Google Translate so far.
 
  • #21
I think those waters there are too shallow for boats... Feels like that...
 
  • #22
Rive said:
I think those waters there are too shallow for boats... Feels like that...
Boats need what, 5cm of depth? I think the water in the photo is deeper than that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K