What is the relation between redshift and absorption lines in galaxies?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nietzsche
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Redshift
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the relationship between redshift and absorption lines in galaxies, emphasizing that different absorption lines can exhibit varying redshift values. Specifically, the redshift formula, z = (λ - λ₀) / λ₀, is applied to two absorption lines observed at 400 nm and 500 nm, originally emitted at 200 nm and 300 nm, yielding redshift values of approximately 1 and 0.67, respectively. This indicates that the lines originate from different objects or conditions, as a single object would exhibit a consistent redshift across all its spectral lines due to factors like relative velocity, gravitational redshifting, and the Doppler effect.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of redshift calculations and the formula z = (λ - λ₀) / λ₀
  • Familiarity with absorption lines in spectroscopy
  • Knowledge of the Doppler effect in astrophysics
  • Basic concepts of gravitational redshifting
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of relative velocity on redshift measurements
  • Explore the concept of gravitational redshift in astrophysical contexts
  • Study the Doppler effect and its applications in astronomy
  • Examine the significance of absorption lines in determining the composition of celestial objects
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysics students, and anyone interested in understanding the mechanics of redshift and its implications for spectral analysis in galaxies.

nietzsche
Messages
185
Reaction score
0
I understand the concept, but not the math.

For example, let's say a galaxy is moving away from us, and we observe one absorption line at 400 nm, and another absorption line at 500 nm. Let's also say that we determine that the radiation was emitted originally at 200 nm and 300 nm respectively. Then according to the formula for redshift,

[tex]z = \frac{\lambda-\lambda_{0}}{\lambda_{0}} = \frac{500-300}{300} \approx 0.67[/tex]

and

[tex]z = \frac{400-200}{200} = 1[/tex]

Does this mean that every line measured will have a different redshift? Or am I missing something here?

Thanks in advance.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
nietzsche said:
I understand the concept, but not the math.

For example, let's say a galaxy is moving away from us, and we observe one absorption line at 400 nm, and another absorption line at 500 nm. Let's also say that we determine that the radiation was emitted originally at 200 nm and 300 nm respectively. Then according to the formula for redshift,

[tex]z = \frac{\lambda-\lambda_{0}}{\lambda_{0}} = \frac{500-300}{300} \approx 0.67[/tex]

and

[tex]z = \frac{400-200}{200} = 1[/tex]

Does this mean that every line measured will have a different redshift? Or am I missing something here?

Thanks in advance.

The two lines you describe are redshifted by different factors. Specifically, the multiplier for redshifting one line is not the same for redshifting the other line. So one would have to assume the lines are not from the same object. For a given object, the wavelengths of all its lines are shifted by the same constant multiplier, and its value depends on several factors (object's relative velocity, gravitational redshifting, and Doppler effect).
 
fleem said:
The two lines you describe are redshifted by different factors. Specifically, the multiplier for redshifting one line is not the same for redshifting the other line. So one would have to assume the lines are not from the same object. For a given object, the wavelengths of all its lines are shifted by the same constant multiplier, and its value depends on several factors (object's relative velocity, gravitational redshifting, and Doppler effect).

Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
26K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K