MHB What is the Result of Raising a Complex Number to a Power?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Petrus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form Rectangular
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the expression \(\left(\frac{1}{2}+i\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} \right)^{100}\) in the form \(a+ib\). The initial calculations correctly identify the modulus and argument, leading to the expression \(1*e^{i\frac{100\pi}{3}}\). However, a mistake is made in simplifying the angle, which should be \(\frac{4\pi}{3}\) instead of \(\frac{\pi}{3}\). Applying de Moivre's theorem reveals that the correct result is \(-\frac{1}{2}-i\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\). The discussion highlights the importance of accurately calculating angles in complex number exponentiation.
Petrus
Messages
702
Reaction score
0
Hello MHB,
calculate $$\left(\frac{1}{2}+i\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} \right)^{100}$$ in the form $$a+ib$$

progress:
I start to calculate argument and get it to $$r=1$$ (argument)
then $$\cos\theta=\frac{1}{2} \ sin\theta=\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}$$ we se it's in first quadrant( where x and y is positive)
$$1*e^{i\frac{100\pi}{3}}$$
notice that we can always take away 2pi so we can simplify that to
$$1*e^{i\frac{\pi}{3}}$$
$$1*e^{i\frac{\pi}{3}}=\cos(\frac{\pi}{3}) + i \sin (\frac{\pi}{3}) = \frac{1}{2}+i\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}$$
but the facit says $$\frac{-1}{2}-i\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}$$

Regards,

 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Petrus said:
Hello MHB,
calculate $$\left(\frac{1}{2}+i\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} \right)^{100}$$ in the form $$a+ib$$

progress:
I start to calculate argument and get it to $$r=1$$ (argument)
then $$\cos\theta=\frac{1}{2} \ sin\theta=\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}$$ we se it's in first quadrant( where x and y is positive)
$$1*e^{i\frac{100\pi}{3}}$$
notice that we can always take away 2pi so we can simplify that to
$$1*e^{i\frac{\pi}{3}}$$
$$1*e^{i\frac{\pi}{3}}=\cos(\frac{\pi}{3}) + i \sin (\frac{\pi}{3}) = \frac{1}{2}+i\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}$$
but the facit says $$\frac{-1}{2}-i\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}$$

Regards,

Hey Petrus!

What is $$\frac {100\pi}{3} \pmod{2\pi}$$?
 
I like Serena said:
Hey Petrus!

What is $$\frac {100\pi}{3} \pmod{2\pi}$$?
$$\frac{4}{3}$$

- - - Updated - - -

Thanks I like Serena I see what I did wrong :)

Regards,
 
Petrus said:
$$\frac{4}{3}$$

That should be $$\frac{4\pi}{3}$$. (Yeah, I know, I'm a nitpicker.)

So what's $$\cos \frac{4\pi}{3} + i \sin \frac{4\pi}{3}$$?
 
I like Serena said:
(Yeah, I know, I'm a nitpicker
nitpicker or not, I am grateful for the fast responed!

Regards,
 
If I were to work the problem, I would write:

$$\left(\frac{1}{2}+i\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} \right)^{100}= \left(\cos\left(\frac{\pi}{3}+2k\pi \right)+i\sin\left(\frac{\pi}{3}+2k\pi \right) \right)^{100}$$

Now applying de Moivre's theorem we have:

$$\cos\left(\frac{100\pi}{3}+200k\pi \right)+i\sin\left(\frac{100\pi}{3}+200k\pi \right)=\cos\left(\frac{4\pi}{3}+232k\pi \right)+i\sin\left(\frac{4\pi}{3}+232k\pi \right)= -\left(\frac{1}{2}+i\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} \right)$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top