What is the Role of DNA Imprinting in Genetic Diseases?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ken Natton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dna
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of DNA imprinting and its potential role in genetic diseases, particularly in the context of a study that suggests the presence of fetal DNA in a mother's brain. Participants explore the implications of this finding and its relation to genetic inheritance and disease manifestation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the terminology of "male DNA" and "female DNA," suggesting that it is misleading and that all DNA is human DNA.
  • One participant clarifies that the article's focus on male DNA refers to the presence of Y-chromosome DNA from a fetus in the mother's brain, which is used for easier identification.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of DNA imprinting, explaining that it can affect the expression of genetic diseases depending on whether a mutation is inherited from the mother or the father.
  • Examples are provided, such as Angelman syndrome and Prader-Willi syndrome, which arise from the same genetic defect depending on parental origin.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the terminology used in the article and the implications of the findings. There is no consensus on whether the article represents good science or journalism, and the discussion on DNA imprinting and its effects on genetic diseases remains open-ended.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the clarity of scientific terminology and the implications of genetic imprinting, which are not fully resolved. The relationship between DNA imprinting and specific genetic diseases is presented with examples but lacks comprehensive exploration of underlying mechanisms.

Ken Natton
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
Here you go. I’m interested in what the experts say about this. On another forum, my attention was drawn to this article:

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/technol...ains-commonly-flooded-male-dna-225612162.html

Male DNA? Female DNA? There’s no such thing, surely. Only human DNA. I mean, I know about the ‘Y’ chromosome, but apart from the reality of what that is and how it does what it does, that is clearly not what they mean here. So is this bad science or bad journalism? I am going to be astonished if you tell me that it is both good science and good journalism. It will put me back pretty much to square one.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
The point of the article is not that there is specifically "male DNA" that is within the "female DNA" of the mother's brain. Rather, the point of the article is to show that a fetus' DNA can be found in a mother's brain. Because this DNA comes from a different individual (not because the DNA comes from a male), this DNA may act differently than the mother's own DNA (although it's not yet clear from the research if the DNA is doing anything).

The reason the article focuses on male DNA is that the researchers performed the study by looking for Y-chromosome DNA in the mothers' brains. Because mothers do not have Y-chromosomes, the testing was easier than looking for other types of DNA.
 
Thank you, Ygggdrasil, for a very lucid response. Do you mind if I quote you back on the other forum? (Its a small UK forum with fewer visitors to the entire site than visit one thread on one forum here. And it is not of a scientific nature, it is a general discussion forum.)
 
Sure, go ahead. Just provide a link back to this thread, so that maybe we can attract some new people to PF :)
 
Ken Natton said:
Male DNA? Female DNA? There’s no such thing, surely. Only human DNA.

Actually there is such a thing, but as Ygggdrasil explained that is different from the subject of the research study.

Just to be complete: DNA gets differentially marked in the egg or sperm, this is called imprinting. If a child inherits a mutation in a certain gene, either from the mother or the father, it can (not always) make a difference to what disease it'll develop.

For example: if a defective part of chromosome 15 is inherited from the mother, the child will develop Angelman syndrome. However, if the child inherits the exact same defect but from the father it will develop Prader-Willi syndrome.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angelman_syndrome
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prader-Willi_syndrome
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K