What is the Role of Schwann Cells in Speeding Up Nervous System Signals?

AI Thread Summary
Schwann cells form the myelin sheath around axons, which supports and nourishes neurons. The nodes of Ranvier between Schwann cells allow for the rapid transmission of signals by enabling impulses to jump from node to node. This jumping mechanism significantly increases the speed of signal propagation compared to traveling along the entire axon surface. The myelin sheath prevents sodium ions from diffusing into the neuron, but the nodes facilitate faster communication. Understanding this process is crucial for grasping how the nervous system efficiently transmits signals.
PPonte
Some axons are wrapped in a myelin sheath formed from the plasma membranes of specialized glial cells known as Schwann cells. Schwann cells serve as supportive, nutritive, and service facilities for neurons. The gap between Schwann cells is known as the node of Ranvier, and serves as points along the neuron for generating a signal. Signals jumping from node to node travel hundreds of times faster than signals traveling along the surface of the axon. This allows your brain to communicate with your toes in a few thousandths of a second.

Would someone explain me, please, the sentence in bold?
My doubt is why signals jumping from node to node travel hundreds of times faster than signals traveling along the surface of the axon.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay, the fatty myelin sheaths that wrap around axons do not allow the sodium ions to diffuse into the neuron, thus inhibiting a neural response. But, there is a way to get around that. The gaps, or nodes of Ranvier, allow the impulse to travel hundreds of times faster because many parts of the neuron that are myelinated can be bypassed. This means that the signal literally jumps from node to node, and it is faster than having an action potential travel along the entire axon.

Does that help? If you look at a diagram of a myelinated axon, you may see it more clearly.
 
Thank you vitaly for your explanation, altough I did already understand it by information colected in a search. I should had advised, sorry.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
22
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top