What is the solution for a limit problem with an indeterminate form of 0/0?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Macleef
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on resolving the limit problem involving the indeterminate form 0/0 using L'Hopital's Rule. Participants emphasize that when substituting values leads to 0/0, applying L'Hopital's Rule is essential for finding the limit. The technique of multiplying by the conjugate, specifically 2 + sqrt(x), is highlighted as an effective method to simplify the expression and cancel the problematic factors in both the numerator and denominator.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus
  • Familiarity with L'Hopital's Rule
  • Knowledge of algebraic manipulation techniques
  • Experience with indeterminate forms in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study L'Hopital's Rule applications in various indeterminate forms
  • Learn about algebraic techniques for simplifying limits
  • Explore examples of limits involving square roots and radicals
  • Practice solving limit problems that result in 0/0 forms
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, educators teaching limit concepts, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of resolving indeterminate forms in mathematical analysis.

Macleef
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
1z6ftwo.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should have 0/0 not 6/0. In any case, try a trick similar to what you did with the radical in the denominator.
 
Well if you plug the four in initially you get:

2-2/(3-3)=0/0

Your trick did not work nor does using the other radical as Mathdope suggests.

But, never fear, 0/0 limits call for one man...


L'Hopital!

Since it is indeterminate form, it is eligible for L'Hopital's rule. That should make it work.
 
workerant said:
Well if you plug the four in initially you get:

2-2/(3-3)=0/0

Your trick did not work nor does using the other radical as Mathdope suggests.

But, never fear, 0/0 limits call for one man...


L'Hopital!

Since it is indeterminate form, it is eligible for L'Hopital's rule. That should make it work.

Multiplying by 2+sqrt(x) does so work. You can then cancel the factor that's going to zero in the numerator and the denominator.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K