What is the Spectral Radius of Partitioned Matrices M1 and M2?

  • Level: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ali987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radius
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
2 replies · 2K views
ali987
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

consider two following partitioned matrices:

[tex]\begin{array}{l}<br /> {M_1} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}<br /> { - \frac{1}{2}{X_1}} & {{X_2}} \\<br /> {{X_3}} & { - \frac{1}{2}{X_4}} \\<br /> \end{array}} \right] \\ <br /> {M_2} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}<br /> {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}<br /> {{X_1}} & { - I} \\<br /> I & 0 \\<br /> \end{array}} & {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}<br /> 0 & 0 \\<br /> 0 & 0 \\<br /> \end{array}} \\<br /> {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}<br /> 0 & 0 \\<br /> 0 & 0 \\<br /> \end{array}} & {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}<br /> {{X_4}} & { - I} \\<br /> I & 0 \\<br /> \end{array}} \\<br /> \end{array}} \right] \\ <br /> \end{array}[/tex]

I want to show that spectral radius (maximum absolute value of eigenvalues) of M1 and M2 are equal, but I don't know how!

this is general form of my problem the real one is somewhat easier (or maybe more complex)!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you need more constraints on the problem, one can find counterexamples such that this is not true.
 
[tex]\begin{array}{l}<br /> {X_1} = A_2^{ - 1}{B_2} \\ <br /> {X_2} = \Delta A_2^{ - 1}L \\ <br /> {X_3} = \Delta A_1^{ - 1}{L^T} \\ <br /> {X_4} = A_1^{ - 1}{B_1} \\ <br /> \end{array}[/tex]

In which

[tex]\begin{array}{l}<br /> {A_1} = G + \frac{{{\Delta ^2}}}{4}{L^T}{C^{ - 1}}L \\ <br /> {A_2} = C + \frac{{{\Delta ^2}}}{4}L{G^{ - 1}}{L^T} \\ <br /> {B_1} = 2\left( {\frac{{{\Delta ^2}}}{4}{L^T}{C^{ - 1}}L - G} \right) \\ <br /> {B_2} = 2\left( {\frac{{{\Delta ^2}}}{4}L{G^{ - 1}}{L^T} - C} \right) \\ <br /> \end{array}[/tex]

where

[tex]\Delta =[/tex] positive constant coefficient

C and G are symmetric and positive definite.