MHB What is the sum of polynomial zeros?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Amad27
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomial Sum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the sum of polynomial zeros for the polynomial P(x) = x^3 - ax^2 + bx - 65, where a, b, r, and s are nonzero integers. Using Vieta's Formulas, the relationship between a, b, r, s, and k (the other real zero) is established, leading to several cases based on the values of r^2 + s^2. The calculations show that the correct total for the sum of a across valid cases is 80, after eliminating invalid combinations. The thread also notes a forum categorization error, emphasizing the importance of posting in the appropriate section for clarity and organization.
Amad27
Messages
409
Reaction score
1
There are nonzero integers $a$, $b$, $r$, and $s$ such that the complex number $r+si$ is a zero of the polynomial $P(x) = x^3 - ax^2 + bx - 65$. For each possible combination of $a$ and $b$, let $p_{a,b}$ be the sum of the zeroes of $P(x)$. Find the sum of the $p_{a,b}$'s for all possible combinations of $a$ and $b$.

From Vieta's Formulas, I got:

$a=2r+k$
$b=2rk+r^2+s^2$
$65=k(r^2+s^2)$

Where $k$ is the other real zero.

Then I split it into several cases: $r^2 + s^2 = 1, 5, 13, 65$ then:

For case 1: $r = \{2, -2, 1, -1 \}$

$\sum a = 2(\sum r) + k \implies a = 13$

Then for case 2: $r^2 + s^2 = 13$, it is that,

$\sum a = 2(\sum r) + k \implies a = 5$

Case 3:

$\sum a = 2(\sum r) + k \implies a = 65$

Case 4:

$\sum a = 2(\sum r) + k \implies a = 1$

$$\sum a = 1 + 65 + 5 + 13 = 84$$

The correct answer is $80$, why?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Olok,

Yes, the problem actually asked us to find the value $\sum a$.

You're definitely in the right track when you considered different cases for $r^2 + s^2$ and $k$ since we got $k(r^2+s^2)=65=1(65)=(65)(1)=5(13)=13(5)$.

But you must bear in mind that:

1. The question told us $a,\,b,\,r,\,s$ are nonzero integers, here, we could cross out the possibility that $k(r^2+s^2)=(65)(1)$ since $r^2+s^2\ne 1$.

2. When we're dealing with the squares, such as in this instance and take for example when we have $k(r^2+s^2)=(5)(13)=5(2^2+3^2)=5((-2)^2+(-3)^2)$, the target expression $a=2r+k$ is equivalent to $2k$ since the sum of both the values of $r$ equals zero:

$a=2r+k=2(2)+5+2(-2)+5=2(5)$

Therefore, we only need to consider all the possible positive values for $r$ to determine the corresponding $k$ and then multiply $k$ by 2 to get the answer.

And note that we have:

$k(r^2+s^2)=(1)(65)=1(1^2+8^2)=1(8^2+1^2)=1(4^2+7^2)=1(7^2+4^2)$

$k(r^2+s^2)=(5)(13)=5(2^2+3^2)=5(3^2+2^2)$

$k(r^2+s^2)=(13)(5)=13(1^2+2^2)=5(2^2+1^2)$

Therefore,

$\sum a = 2(4(1)+2(5)+2(13))=2(40)=80$

Edit: This thread is previously posted in the Pre-Calculus forum when it should be in the Pre-Algebra and Algebra forum, I have since moved it here, and we hope the OP will take care of which the forum is best suit for the topic in the future as this makes MHB a more organized and thus a more useful place for everyone. Thank you.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top