The forum discussion centers on the definition of truth, primarily referencing Karl Marx's assertion that "Truth is agreement with fact." Participants debate the implications of this definition, arguing that truth is not absolute and is contingent upon observed facts. The conversation explores the limitations of language in defining truth and the distinction between concepts and facts, with some participants advocating for a more nuanced understanding of truth as "indications of truth" rather than absolute certainty.
PREREQUISITESPhilosophers, linguists, and anyone interested in the nature of truth and its implications in both scientific and abstract contexts.
Truth is relative to the observer and has more to do with "timing" than anything else. Which is to say, there's a time and place for everything. Then and only then could the truth possibly exist (i.e., in its own time).Originally posted by Alexander
Best definition of truth I ever read came from Marx: "Truth is agreement with fact." In essense, this equates truth with observed fact. Therefore, there is no "absolute truth" or "the truth" - all we have is just observed fact(s).
Is there any better definition of truth?