What is the underlying connection between geometry and matter in string theory?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter SW VandeCarr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    String Theories
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the validation of string theory in relation to quantum mechanics (QM) and general relativity (GR). Participants argue that no string theory has yet made accurate predictions across all known physical constants, with some physicists doubting its potential for future validation. The consensus is that a new theory must not only replicate existing experimental data but also provide additional testable predictions, particularly in the context of string theory's extra dimensions. Critics highlight the lack of measurable, distinctive predictions from string theory, questioning its status as a viable scientific framework.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics (QM) and general relativity (GR)
  • Familiarity with string theory concepts, including extra dimensions
  • Knowledge of scientific validation criteria, such as falsifiability
  • Awareness of the standard model of particle physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of string theory's extra dimensions on physical predictions
  • Explore the concept of perturbative vs. nonperturbative string dynamics
  • Investigate the landscape problem in string theory and its implications for model selection
  • Examine recent critiques of string theory's scientific validity and its future in theoretical physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, theoretical researchers, and students interested in advanced topics in string theory, quantum gravity, and the philosophical implications of scientific theories.

  • #31
marcus said:
2. to understand how the combined geometry-and-matter entity arises
(why geometry responds to matter and why matter follows geometry, they must be fundamentally the same underlying thing because of this close interaction, what is this thing?)

...

You have posed what I would agree is a fundamental question. One could say that Einstein’s great leap of imagination was to recognise because of the equivalence of inertial mass with gravitational mass that mass was warping space. However, to my interpretation the surprise is that this works. Einstein assumed that matter warping space created gravity & derived his general theory of relativity from this assumption so the surprise is that it works so well without a clear understanding why. As you said, Marcus, it’s this relationship between the geometry of space-time & matter that needs an explanation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K