What is the velocity of a car accelerating at a non-constant rate?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the velocity of a car accelerating at a non-constant rate, defined by the acceleration function a(s) = k·s^n, with k = 7.96 and n = 0.454. Participants clarify that to find the velocity at a distance of s = 1.3 m, one must integrate the acceleration function. The correct approach involves setting up the relationship between acceleration, velocity, and displacement, leading to the equation v(s) = √((2*(c*n + c + k*s^(n+1)))/(n+1)), where c is determined by the initial condition v(0) = 0. The final velocity at s = 1.3 m is derived through integration and substitution of the given parameters.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically integration techniques.
  • Familiarity with ordinary differential equations (ODEs).
  • Knowledge of kinematics, particularly the relationships between acceleration, velocity, and displacement.
  • Basic proficiency in using mathematical software like Wolfram Alpha for solving equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the integration of non-linear ordinary differential equations (ODEs).
  • Learn about kinematic equations and their applications in physics.
  • Explore the use of Wolfram Alpha for solving complex mathematical problems.
  • Review the concepts of initial conditions in differential equations and their significance in problem-solving.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics or engineering, particularly those focusing on dynamics and kinematics, as well as educators seeking to enhance their understanding of non-linear motion and integration techniques.

albert12345
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A car accelerates with a(s) = k·sn m/s2, from 0 m/s. What is the velocity of the car when s=1,3m?

Homework Equations



k = 7,96 och n = 0,454

The Attempt at a Solution



I know I have to intergrate in some way, but I really don't know how to start? I don't have the time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are you trying to find? Distance or velocity?

for velocity: v = v_{0} + \int_{t_{0}}^{t}a(t)dt

for distance: x = x_{0} + \int_{t_{0}}^{t}v(t)dt - using the velocity found above.
 
grindfreak said:
What are you trying to find? Distance or velocity?

for velocity: v = v_{0} + \int_{t_{0}}^{t}a(t)dt

I am trying to find the velocity at s=1,3m
How do i calculate t, so i can solve your intergral?
 
Yes you should be able to use the integral, although I'm having a bit of trouble understanding the functional relationship of your acceleration. What is the dependent variable? I'm not sure what "s" is.
 
grindfreak said:
Yes you should be able to use the integral, although I'm having a bit of trouble understanding the functional relationship of your acceleration. What is the dependent variable? I'm not sure what "s" is.

s is the distance travelled
 
Oh ok, well in that case you have to use a little trick:
a = \frac{dv}{dt}=\frac{dv}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt}=v\frac{dv}{dx}

then the integral becomes:

\int vdv=\int adx

Hopefully you can figure it out from there.
 
I'm sorry but I don't understand :(
 
Hmm...if a(s)=k*s*n and the car starts at s=0 with v=0, then the car will have an acceleration of 0 and will just stay stationary. Am I missing anything?
 
Im sorry!

I wrote the expression wrong, it should be:

A(s)=k*s^n m/s^2
 
  • #10
EmittingLight said:
Hmm...if a(s)=k*s*n and the car starts at s=0 with v=0, then the car will have an acceleration of 0 and will just stay stationary. Am I missing anything?

No, this only means that v_0 = x_0 = 0. As long as the acceleration is nonzero, the particle will have nonconstant motion.

But let s = x and integrate a over x and you'll have your answer.
 
  • #11
grindfreak said:
No, this only means that v_0 = x_0 = 0. As long as the acceleration is nonzero, the particle will have nonconstant motion.

But let s = x and integrate a over x and you'll have your answer.

But the acceleration is a function of the displacement such that if the displacement is zero, then the acceleration is also zero. It also happens that the velocity is zero initially, so the displacement would never change from zero and hence the acceleration would also never change from zero. Although this is only if the initial displacement is zero, which the question never actually states (it never tells us initial displacement).
 
  • #12
The answer should be 4,0m/s. I got 8m/s when I integrated 1 time. What did i do wrong?
 
  • #13
What do you mean by 'integrated 1 time'? Integrating a(s) from s=0 to s=1.3 is not going to give a velocity, the units will be \frac{m}{s^2}*m = \frac{m^2}{s^2}, while velocity has units of \frac{m}{s}.

I'm not actually sure what grindfreak means when he says \int vdv=\int adx then "integrate a over x and you'll have your answer", which seems to be implying that \int vdv=\int vdt, which is not correct as far as I know.

But his application of the chain rule does give something useful:
a =\frac{dv}{ds}\frac{ds}{dt}=v\frac{dv}{ds}
If you'll recall, the question tells us what a is in terms of s:
a = k*s^n
So:
v\frac{dv}{ds}=k*s^n
Which is a first order non-linear ordinary differential equation for v(s) from which we can obtain our desired answer v(s=1.3), which leads me to believe that there must be some other way to do this question because I only started learning that kind of maths in a second year university maths unit. I know I'm not suppose to give you the answers, but you could have just put this straight into Wolfram Alpha anyway, like this, so I might as well just show what it spat out:
v(s)=\sqrt{\frac{2*(c*n+c+k*s^{n+1})}{n+1}}
To find the constant c, remember that v(0)=0 from the information in the question.
 
  • #14
Here's how it should integrate. Since the initial values for both velocity and displacement are 0, the right integral looks like:
\int_{0}^{s}ads^{'}=k\int_{0}^{s}(s^{'})^{n}ds^{'}=\frac{ks^{n+1}}{n+1}
The right integral is:
\int_{0}^{v}v^{'}dv' = \frac{1}{2}v^{2}
Now don't be confused about the primes, it's just used to discern between the limits and the variables you're integrating over (you'll see this quite a bit in more upper level courses).

Now, equating these two answers together you get:
\frac{ks^{n+1}}{n+1} = \frac{1}{2}v^{2}
Now solve for v and plug in your numbers and you're done :D

*Just realized EmittingLight came up with the same conclusion.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
883
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
963
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K