I What is time in string/M-theory and Four-dimensionalism?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter kodama
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
Click For Summary
In string theory, time is considered as one dimension within a ten-dimensional framework, comprising nine spatial dimensions and one time dimension. M-theory expands this to eleven dimensions, maintaining a single time dimension alongside ten spatial dimensions. The discussion explores how the concepts of three-dimensionalism versus four-dimensionalism relate to these theories, particularly in the context of our experience of four-dimensional spacetime in general relativity. The additional six or seven dimensions proposed by string and M-theory are primarily for mathematical consistency and remain unobserved in experiments. Overall, the nature of time in these theories raises complex questions about the fundamental structure of reality.
kodama
Messages
1,080
Reaction score
144
TL;DR
concept of time
what is time according to string/M-theory

do objects in string theory also have temporal parts?

and how does the debate of Three vs Four-dimensionalism apply to string theory which posits 10/11 dimensions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What we experience as three spatial dimensions plus time, is the four dimensional spacetime of GR.
kodama said:
what is time according to string/M-theory
do objects in string theory also have temporal parts?
In string theory, spacetime is ten-dimensional (nine spatial dimensions, and one time dimension). In M-theory, spacetime is eleven-dimensional (ten spatial dimensions, and one time dimension).

kodama said:
... and how does the debate of Three vs Four-dimensionalism apply to string theory which posits 10/11 dimensions?
The extra 6/7 dimensions are hypothesised for mathematical consistency, and are not observed in experiments.
 
Quick question that I haven't been able to find the answer to. Greenhouse gasses both warm and cool the atmosphere by slowing heat loss to space. But what would happen without GHGs? I read that the earth would be colder (though still relatively warm), but why? Without GHGs the atmosphere would still be a similar mass and still warmed by conduction from the surface, yet without a means to radiate that heat to space. Why wouldn't the atmosphere accumulate heat over time, becoming warmer? How...