What kind of matter formed Primordial Blackholes?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mlesnita Daniel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blackholes Matter
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the formation of primordial black holes (PBHs) and clarifies that it is the density of matter in the early universe that collapsed to form these black holes, not "space itself." The early universe exhibited non-homogeneous density, with certain regions being denser and hotter, which allowed for the potential collapse into black holes. The conversation highlights the misleading phrasing in an article that suggests space itself could collapse, emphasizing the importance of distinguishing between the non-homogeneity of space and the matter within it.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity concepts
  • Knowledge of cosmology and the early universe
  • Familiarity with black hole formation theories
  • Basic grasp of astrophysical terminology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanisms of black hole formation in cosmology
  • Study the implications of non-homogeneous density in the early universe
  • Explore the current theories and evidence surrounding primordial black holes
  • Investigate the relationship between matter density and cosmic structure formation
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, physics students, and anyone interested in the formation and implications of primordial black holes in the universe.

Mlesnita Daniel
Messages
16
Reaction score
2
I read somewhere "space was not completely homogenous (the same at every point). Instead, some areas were denser and hotter than others, and these dense regions could have collapsed into black holes." and I was wondering what does it exactly means?

Did space itself fall into becoming PBHs (primordial black holes) or it means that the matter that WAS IN space was denser and it collapsed to form such objects?

Thank you!

Edit: Where I read it: https://astronomy.com/news/2019/07/primordial-black-holes
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Mlesnita Daniel said:
I read somewhere
Where? Please provide a reference - it helps us to know what you know when we're answering.

Mlesnita Daniel said:
Did space itself fall into becoming PBHs (primordial black holes) or it means that the matter that WAS IN space was denser and it collapsed to form such objects
The matter. "Space itself" isn't really a concept that makes sense in general relativity. The density of matter in the early universe wasn't completely uniform, and if it varied enough it's possible that the densest bits collapsed to form black holes. I don't believe that the signatures of such things have been detected, but I don't think they are ruled out.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mlesnita Daniel
I put the reference in an edit now, thanks for pointing out and thank you for clarifying!:)
 
The article should answer your questions.
 
I agree with the OP that the article is misleadingly phrased. It says:
astronomy.com said:
in that fraction of a second after the universe itself began, space was not completely homogenous (the same at every point). Instead, some areas were denser and hotter than others, and these dense regions could have collapsed into black holes.
That does read (incorrectly) like space is collapsing to form black holes. This part isn't making a clear distinction between space being non-homogeneous (true, with a certain amount of glossing over complicated topics) and the matter in space being non-homogeneous (also true). The two facts are inextricably related, but aren't exactly the same statement.

Maybe they were trying to avoid saying "matter"? It wasn't matter in the colloquial sense of a bunch of atoms. But it was the stuff that eventually cooled down (the bits of it that didn't fall into these hypothetical primordial black holes, anyway) to form matter and radiation as we see it today.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
821
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K