What made the scientists to think about Antimatter

  • Thread starter mubashirmansoor
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Antimatter
In summary, scientists began to think about antimatter when Paul Dirac developed an equation that had negative energy solutions. This led to the prediction and later discovery of the positron, the antiparticle of the electron. While there is currently no practical use for antimatter, it is being researched for potential applications and ideas.
  • #1
mubashirmansoor
260
0
I just want to know what made the scientists to think about Antimatter...
And what's the use of it?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
mubashirmansoor said:
I just want to know what made the scientists to think about Antimatter...
I'am not to sure there is a modifed veriosn of[itex] E = m c^2[/itex] with [itex]E = - or + m c^2[/itex] I think they created it in particle acceltor's.
And what's the use of it?
There's currently no use for it other then research.It is very expensive and hard to produce and it hard to keep in container.It is possible to use it as power source but not yet if ever.
 
  • #3
Read up on the ideas of Dirac. He's pretty much accrediated with the prediction of antimatter.
 
  • #4
From Wikipedia:

In 1928 Paul Dirac developed a relativistic equation for the electron, now known as the Dirac equation. Curiously, the equation was found to have negative energy solutions in addition to the normal positive ones. This presented a problem, as electrons tend toward the lowest possible energy level; energies of negative infinity are nonsensical. As a way of getting around this, Dirac proposed that the vacuum can be considered a "sea" of negative energy, the Dirac sea. Any electrons would therefore have to sit on top of the sea.

Thinking further, Dirac found that a "hole" in the sea would have a positive charge. At first he thought that this was the proton, but Hermann Weyl pointed out the hole should have the same mass as the electron. The existence of this particle, the positron, was confirmed experimentally in 1932 by Carl D. Anderson.

Today's standard model shows that every particle has an antiparticle, for which each additive quantum number has the negative of the value it has for the normal matter particle. The sign reversal applies only to quantum numbers (properties) which are additive, such as charge, but not to mass, for example. The positron has the opposite charge but the same mass as the electron. An atom of antihydrogen is composed of a negatively-charged antiproton being orbited by a positively-charged positron .

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter
 

1. What is antimatter?

Antimatter is a form of matter that is composed of antiparticles, which have the same mass as regular particles but have opposite charge. When antimatter comes into contact with regular matter, they annihilate each other and release a large amount of energy.

2. How did scientists discover antimatter?

The existence of antimatter was first predicted by physicist Paul Dirac in 1931. It was later confirmed in 1932 by Carl D. Anderson, who observed the first antiparticle, the positron, in a cloud chamber experiment.

3. Why did scientists start studying antimatter?

Scientists were curious about the symmetries in the laws of physics and wanted to explore if there was a mirror image of the matter that we know and observe. The discovery of antimatter opened the door to a deeper understanding of the fundamental building blocks of the universe.

4. How is antimatter used in scientific research?

Antimatter is used in particle accelerators, such as the Large Hadron Collider, to study the behavior of particles and their antiparticles. It is also used in medical imaging, such as PET scans, to detect and treat diseases. Additionally, scientists are researching the potential of antimatter as a future energy source.

5. What are the challenges in studying antimatter?

One of the main challenges in studying antimatter is its unstable nature. When it comes into contact with regular matter, it annihilates and disappears, making it difficult to study. Additionally, producing and storing antimatter requires advanced technology and is still a costly process for scientists.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
599
Replies
5
Views
742
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Back
Top