What made the scientists to think about Antimatter

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mubashirmansoor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antimatter
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the origins of the concept of antimatter, exploring the historical context and scientific reasoning that led to its prediction, as well as its potential applications and current limitations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express curiosity about what prompted scientists to think about antimatter and its uses.
  • One participant suggests a modified version of the equation E = mc², proposing the existence of both positive and negative energy solutions, although this is presented with uncertainty.
  • Another participant references Paul Dirac's contributions, noting that he developed the Dirac equation which led to the prediction of antimatter.
  • A later reply elaborates on Dirac's ideas, explaining the concept of the Dirac sea and how it relates to the existence of positrons, including historical confirmation of the positron's existence.
  • Some participants mention that while antimatter could potentially be used as a power source, its current applications are limited to research due to challenges in production and containment.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the historical significance of Dirac's work in predicting antimatter, but there is no consensus on the practical applications or the implications of negative energy solutions.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to complex theoretical concepts such as negative energy solutions and the Dirac sea, which may require further clarification. There are also assumptions about the feasibility of using antimatter as a power source that remain unresolved.

mubashirmansoor
Messages
258
Reaction score
0
I just want to know what made the scientists to think about Antimatter...
And what's the use of it?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
mubashirmansoor said:
I just want to know what made the scientists to think about Antimatter...

I'am not to sure there is a modifed veriosn of[itex]E = m c^2[/itex] with [itex]E = - or + m c^2[/itex] I think they created it in particle acceltor's.
And what's the use of it?

There's currently no use for it other then research.It is very expensive and hard to produce and it hard to keep in container.It is possible to use it as power source but not yet if ever.
 
Read up on the ideas of Dirac. He's pretty much accrediated with the prediction of antimatter.
 
From Wikipedia:

In 1928 Paul Dirac developed a relativistic equation for the electron, now known as the Dirac equation. Curiously, the equation was found to have negative energy solutions in addition to the normal positive ones. This presented a problem, as electrons tend toward the lowest possible energy level; energies of negative infinity are nonsensical. As a way of getting around this, Dirac proposed that the vacuum can be considered a "sea" of negative energy, the Dirac sea. Any electrons would therefore have to sit on top of the sea.

Thinking further, Dirac found that a "hole" in the sea would have a positive charge. At first he thought that this was the proton, but Hermann Weyl pointed out the hole should have the same mass as the electron. The existence of this particle, the positron, was confirmed experimentally in 1932 by Carl D. Anderson.

Today's standard model shows that every particle has an antiparticle, for which each additive quantum number has the negative of the value it has for the normal matter particle. The sign reversal applies only to quantum numbers (properties) which are additive, such as charge, but not to mass, for example. The positron has the opposite charge but the same mass as the electron. An atom of antihydrogen is composed of a negatively-charged antiproton being orbited by a positively-charged positron .

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K