What makes a function quasi-linear?

  • Thread starter Thread starter newphysist
  • Start date Start date
newphysist
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have two questions.

(1) I am trying to understand how the following function is quasi-linear:

Code:
f = min(1/2,x,x^2)

For it to be quasi linear it has to be quasi convex and quasi concave at same time.

(2) I think the reason the above function is not concave is cause on a certain interval (0,1) f = x^2 which is convex. Am I correct in my reasoning?

Thanks guys
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What is the domain of your function?
 
Real numbers R
 
newphysist said:
(1) I am trying to understand how the following function is quasi-linear:
Code:
f = min(1/2,x,x^2)
For it to be quasi linear it has to be quasi convex and quasi concave at same time.
Yes. Which it is.
(2) I think the reason the above function is not concave is cause on a certain interval (0,1) f = x^2 which is convex. Am I correct in my reasoning?
Yes, though it would be more accurate to observe that on (0, 1/√2) it is not concave. (min{.5, x/2, x} would have been concave.)
 
This function is monotonic. And every monotonic function is quasilinear.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top