What makes a function quasi-linear?

  • Thread starter Thread starter newphysist
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The function f = min(1/2, x, x^2) is identified as quasi-linear because it is both quasi-convex and quasi-concave. The reasoning behind its lack of concavity is correct; specifically, it is not concave on the interval (0, 1/√2) due to the segment where f = x^2, which is convex. Additionally, the function is monotonic, and all monotonic functions are considered quasi-linear. Understanding these properties clarifies the function's classification. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the conditions that define quasi-linearity in mathematical functions.
newphysist
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have two questions.

(1) I am trying to understand how the following function is quasi-linear:

Code:
f = min(1/2,x,x^2)

For it to be quasi linear it has to be quasi convex and quasi concave at same time.

(2) I think the reason the above function is not concave is cause on a certain interval (0,1) f = x^2 which is convex. Am I correct in my reasoning?

Thanks guys
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What is the domain of your function?
 
Real numbers R
 
newphysist said:
(1) I am trying to understand how the following function is quasi-linear:
Code:
f = min(1/2,x,x^2)
For it to be quasi linear it has to be quasi convex and quasi concave at same time.
Yes. Which it is.
(2) I think the reason the above function is not concave is cause on a certain interval (0,1) f = x^2 which is convex. Am I correct in my reasoning?
Yes, though it would be more accurate to observe that on (0, 1/√2) it is not concave. (min{.5, x/2, x} would have been concave.)
 
This function is monotonic. And every monotonic function is quasilinear.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top