What makes Cassiopeia A a fascinating supernova remnant from the 17th century?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Nugatory
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Supernova
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the supernova remnant Cassiopeia A, specifically its historical significance and the interpretation of its observation in relation to the timing of the event. Participants engage with the coverage provided by the Washington Post and express varying opinions on the accuracy and logic of the reporting.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants reference the Washington Post's claim that Cassiopeia A is a remnant of a supernova explosion from the 17th century, noting its visibility from Earth.
  • One participant questions the logic of mixing the observation time with the actual event time, suggesting a lack of seriousness in the reporting.
  • Another participant rates the article negatively, implying dissatisfaction with its content and reasoning.
  • Humorous remarks are made regarding the Washington Post's coverage, including a fictional voicemail from Albert Einstein, which adds a light-hearted tone to the critique.
  • There is a playful debate about the existence of the ether, with a participant framing it as a binary choice.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the quality and logic of the Washington Post's article, with no consensus on the validity of its claims or the interpretation of the supernova remnant.

Contextual Notes

Some statements reflect personal opinions on the article's credibility and the nature of scientific reporting, but these are not universally accepted views.

Nugatory
Mentor
Messages
15,502
Reaction score
10,698
From the Washington Post's coverage of the IXPE orbiting telescope:
Cassiopeia A is the remnant of a supernova explosion that took place when a gigantic star collapsed in the 17th century. It's visible in the night sky about 11,000 light-years away
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: DaveE
Physics news on Phys.org
Mixing the time of observation with the actual time of event?

Come on, starting a rant for every illogical absurdity picked from the news would earn me a permanent ban within a day, I guess :doh: Don't take this so seriously o0)
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur
On a scale of 1 ... 10, that WP article gets a "minus 3" - since we clearly can use any number we want to rate it.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur
Washington Post answering machine: "You have 67 missed calls from the ether by Albert Einstein"
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: DennisN
nuuskur said:
Washington Post answering machine: "You have 67 missed calls from the ether by Albert Einstein"
Either there is an ether or there's not. It's ether-or.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur, BillTre and OmCheeto

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
34K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K