What makes The Matrix a classic sci-fi film?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bystander
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Movies
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the polarizing opinions surrounding "The Matrix" as a classic sci-fi film. While some participants praise its originality and influence on the genre, others criticize the sequels and question the film's overall merit. Key points include the comparison of "The Matrix" to "Tron," with arguments about thematic depth and special effects overshadowing storytelling. Ultimately, the conversation highlights a divide between those who appreciate the film's groundbreaking elements and those who find it lacking.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of film critique terminology
  • Familiarity with sci-fi film history, particularly "The Matrix" and "Tron"
  • Knowledge of cinematic techniques, including special effects and storytelling
  • Awareness of cultural references in film discussions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of "The Matrix" on modern sci-fi cinema
  • Analyze the narrative structure of "Tron" compared to "The Matrix"
  • Explore the evolution of special effects in film from the 1990s to today
  • Investigate philosophical themes in "The Matrix" and their origins
USEFUL FOR

Film enthusiasts, critics, and students of cinema looking to understand the cultural significance and varying perspectives on "The Matrix" and its sequels.

  • #31
Plastic Photon said:
Titanic - there is nothing like watching a movie you already know the ending to

My wife and I had a Video Store a couple of years ago and when this movie came in, one of our customers asked, "Does it have a happy ending?"
:smile: :smile: :smile:

Well, more than 1500 people died in the North Atlantic when a ship thought to be unsinkable sank in a very likely avoidable accident. I'd say "NO!"
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Evo said:
Tron was about a guiy that gut sucked into a video game, he knew he was in a video game and he had to find a way to get out. I loved Tron, but I can't see any comparison to the Matrix.
I see the comparison in that they were both part of a computer system and their main purpose was to free that system and to return to reality. Flynn and Neo both started out as degenerate computer programmers/hackers...I realize they weren't identical, but I think there is at least a parallel there. I can see how they could have started with Tron as an idea and expanded on it.

Ivan said:
I don't find special effects entertaining for their own sake; ie. they have their place, and great special effects can help to make a great movie greater, but I walked out of Matrix feeling as though the entire movie was really just a special effects showcase.

And Descartes did it first.
I agree with the special effects. They have their place. I was not a huge fan of how much wire work they did for the stunts. I was also not a huge fan of the huge gun battles where a million rounds are fired and only the bad guys get hit. I thought it was entertaining.

You'll have to explain the Descartes reference. I'm not that well read.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
4K