What % of PEg must be converted in KE in order to double v?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on determining the percentage of gravitational potential energy (PEg) that must be converted into kinetic energy (KE) to double the velocity of a pendulum. The original poster calculated that 1.5% of PEg is required based on their data, contradicting their teacher's assertion of 25%. The calculations involved initial values of KE at 0.014 J, PEg at 2.836 J, and a velocity of 0.236 m/s, leading to a new velocity of approximately 0.478 m/s and a new KE of 0.057 J. The discrepancy highlights the need for clarity in experimental conditions and calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy (PEg) and kinetic energy (KE) concepts.
  • Familiarity with the equations of motion for pendulums.
  • Basic proficiency in algebra for manipulating energy equations.
  • Knowledge of experimental setup for pendulum motion analysis.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of energy conservation in pendulum motion.
  • Learn how to derive and apply the equations for pendulum dynamics.
  • Investigate the effects of initial conditions on pendulum behavior.
  • Explore methods for accurately measuring energy transformations in pendulum experiments.
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, educators teaching energy concepts, and anyone conducting experiments involving pendulum dynamics and energy transformations.

ness8
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What % of PEg must be converted in KE in order to double the speed of a pendulum? So I have spent a couple of days trying to figure out this problem (it's a lab), and I can't seem to figure it out. I have asked my physics teacher about it, and he said the answer to the question is 25% of gravitational potential energy, which does not match my data.

Homework Equations


Not sure if I need to use any equations here, but if so, PEg = KE (mgh = 1/2mv^2).

The Attempt at a Solution


So the initial KE that I'm working with is 0.014 J, the PEg for that value is 2.836 J, and the velocity for that value is 0.236 m/s. If I double the velocity = 2*0.236 m/s = around 0.478 m/s (I'm using 0.478 m/s because it is the next value of my data, so it would be easier to use.) With this new velocity, the KE is 0.057 J. Therefore, I subtract 0.057 J - 0.014 J = 0.043 J. To find the percentage of 2.836 J, I divide 0.043 J/2.836 J = 0.015*100 = 1.5%, NOT 25%. 25% of 2.836 J is 0.709 J, which does not make sense with my data. I know for a fact that what I did was incorrect because if I try 1.5% with other values in my data, it does not get me to the correct values.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps someone else might understand this problem, but I can't see what you experiment involves.

Is the pendulum moving initially?
 
PeroK said:
Perhaps someone else might understand this problem, but I can't see what you experiment involves.

Is the pendulum moving initially?
My first value for velocity is 0.236 m/s.
 
ness8 said:
My first value for velocity is 0.236 m/s.

I think you should reread your original post and decide whether anyone not completely familiar with your experiment could figure out what you are trying to do.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nidum
Could you provide a more complete context for your question and the question exactly as it was given to you? It seems to me you're misinterpreting the question that was asked.
 
vela said:
Could you provide a more complete context for your question and the question exactly as it was given to you? It seems to me you're misinterpreting the question that was asked.
This is the exact question: What % of PEg must be converted in KE in order to double the speed of the pendulum?
 
PeroK said:
I think you should reread your original post and decide whether anyone not completely familiar with your experiment could figure out what you are trying to do.
This is the exact question: What % of PEg must be converted in KE in order to double the speed of the pendulum?
 
Let us try some Q + A .

What type of pendulum ?

A continuous swinging one like in a clock or a single swing type like used in a Charpy impact test ?
 
300px-Simple_gravity_pendulum.svg.png
A pendulum like this, but with only one swing from left to right.
 
  • #10
So it's more like a Charpy pendulum . For the purpose of the question we have to examine a single swing starting with pendulum pulled a certain angle or distance away from vertical position . We progress .

Now - how have you tried to analyse this problem yourself ? Please show us your workings .
 
  • #11
Nidum said:
So it's more like a Charpy pendulum . For the purpose of the question we have examine a single swing starting with pendulum pulled a certain angle or distance away from vertical position . We progress .

Now - how have you tried to analyse this problem yourself ? Please show us your workings .
So the initial KE that I'm working with is 0.014 J, the PEg for that value is 2.836 J, and the velocity for that value is 0.236 m/s. If I double the velocity = 2*0.236 m/s = around 0.478 m/s (I'm using 0.478 m/s because it is the next value of my data, so it would be easier to use.) With this new velocity, the KE is 0.057 J. Therefore, I subtract 0.057 J - 0.014 J = 0.043 J. To find the percentage of 2.836 J, I divide 0.043 J/2.836 J = 0.015*100 = 1.5%, NOT 25%. 25% of 2.836 J is 0.709 J, which does not make sense with my data. I know for a fact that what I did was incorrect because if I try 1.5% with other values in my data, it does not get me to the correct values.
 
  • #12
Sorry but I don't understand any of that .

Let's try some more Q + A :

What exactly are the initial conditions for the pendulum at the start of the swing ?
 
  • #13
Nidum said:
Sorry but I don't understand any of that .

Let's try some more Q + A :

What exactly are the initial conditions for the pendulum at the start of the swing ?
V = 0.236 m/s
KE = 0.014 J
PEg = 2.836 J
Y-pos = 0.579 m
 
  • #14
Please explain clearly what your experimental set up is and show your workings in some understandable form .

Otherwise I shall ask the mentors to close this thread .
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
23K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K