What other ways can you split an equation into two?

  • Thread starter ainster31
  • Start date
  • #1
157
1
Here are two ways:

$$(x-{ x }_{ 1 })({ x }-{ x }_{ 2 })=0\\ x-{ x }_{ 1 }=0\quad \quad \quad \quad x-{ x }_{ 2 }=0\\ \\$$$$ \\ { e }^{ x }({ c }_{ 1 }-3{ c }_{ 2 })+{ e }^{ -32x }({ c }_{ 5 }-{ c }_{ 4 })=0\\ { c }_{ 1 }-3{ c }_{ 2 }=0\quad \quad \quad \quad \quad { c }_{ 5 }-{ c }_{ 4 }=0$$

Any other ways?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
pbuk
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,139
883
"Splitting an equation in two" is not in general a meaningful mathematical operation. Your second example is incorrect: can you see why? (clue: a = b = 0 is not the only solution to a + b = 0).
 
  • #3
157
1
"Splitting an equation in two" is not in general a meaningful mathematical operation.

Why not?

(clue: a = b = 0 is not the only solution to a + b = 0).

Hmmm... you're right. It's weird that my textbook teaches this technique.

What if it's an identity?
 
Last edited:
  • #4
575
76
Here are two ways:

$$(x-{ x }_{ 1 })({ x }-{ x }_{ 2 })=0\\ x-{ x }_{ 1 }=0\quad \quad \quad \quad x-{ x }_{ 2 }=0\\ \\$$$$ \\ { e }^{ x }({ c }_{ 1 }-3{ c }_{ 2 })+{ e }^{ -32x }({ c }_{ 5 }-{ c }_{ 4 })=0\\ { c }_{ 1 }-3{ c }_{ 2 }=0\quad \quad \quad \quad \quad { c }_{ 5 }-{ c }_{ 4 }=0$$

Any other ways?

The first situation relies on the fact that if the product of two real numbers is zero, then one of those numbers must be zero.

The second situation is a statement about the linear independence of ##e^x## and ##e^{-32x}##; if ##ae^x+be^{-32x}=0## for all ##x## (i.e. ##ae^x+be^{-32x}## is the zero function), then ##a=b=0##. It's similar to the statement that if ##a_0+a_1 x+...+a_n x^n=0## for all ##x##, then ##a_0=a_1=...=a_n=0##.
 
  • #5
pbuk
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,139
883
Why not?
Because it does not in general yield anything useful.

Hmmm... you're right. It's weird that my textbook teaches this technique.
Perhaps the textbook is looking for solutions which are valid for all values of ## x ##?

What if it's an identity?
I don't understand what you mean.
 
  • #6
Integral
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,201
56
Really this is not splitting an equation into two.

It is a way to find zeros of the original equation. Always keep in mind your goals, what are you trying to do. You are not splitting and equation you are looking for zeros.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person

Related Threads on What other ways can you split an equation into two?

Replies
34
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
719
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Top